Halt, you've gone up enough

F

fhl

First drys. Ok, maybe there was a need for info. Give it the benefit of the doubt.
Then the momo boys piled into dcix and they halted it, too?
Starting to look like they just don't want a stock to go vertical.
 
fhl said:
First drys. Ok, maybe there was a need for info. Give it the benefit of the doubt.
Then the momo boys piled into dcix and they halted it, too?
Starting to look like they just don't want a stock to go vertical.[/QUO
.[/QUOTE
do you know the rules for halts resulting from fast stock movements. if not you should learn them.
More...
 

Hey, zdreg, do you know how to reply to a post? After 10000 of your own posts, i'd expect you to at least be that smart.

I haven't found the code for dcix, but for drys, they used a code that did not reflect fast stock movement.

Why are you chiding me for not knowing something that you yourself are clearly ignorant of?
 
fhl said:
Hey, zdreg, do you know how to reply to a post? After 10000 of your own posts, i'd expect you to at least be that smart.

I haven't found the code for dcix, but for drys, they used a code that did not reflect fast stock movement.

Why are you chiding me for not knowing something that you yourself are clearly ignorant of?
More...
what are you talking about? i gave you factually correct info.
dcix had ten volatility halts for fast stock movements.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top