Nearly everyone who works can afford to rent something. eg a single room in a crowded shared house in a bad area.
The criteria is can you find something reasonable to rent paying 30% or less of your income. The article claims half of renters can not and have to pay well above 30%.
I guess historically way more people could find something much better for 30% or less of their income than now.
Its only going to get worse for renters while the Democrats keep the border wide open. But it is great for landlords.
%%Averages..... The average is more tilted towards Besos and Buffet.
] Wonder which group persistently pays credit card interest??I understand, we both worked as kids and did not live at home till 25 like them. I know a kid and his girl who live in San Jose. They make $300,000 and $250,000 and spend everything. No dam house, I gave up on telling them to stop going on trips, eating out every day, it’s infuriating! I would have had $1,000,000 in the bank if me and my first wife made $500,000 by year five.
if they couldn't afford to pay rent, they wouldn't be tenants.
%%The funny thing is that if they saved more, it would only mean stiffer competition to buy Silicon Valley houses and S&P 500 shares.


The article doesn't say they're not paying, it says they are paying more than they can afford, but perhaps someone else already pointed this out. (I only read the first few posts). It is possible to live beyond one's means—often for a relatively extended period of time—especially if relying on credit cards and/or loans from family/friends.If these consumers that make up 70% of gdp spending aren't paying rents then there has to be a story that's unfolding under the surface that no one has a clue about.
The article doesn't say they're not paying, it says they are paying more than they can afford, but perhaps someone else already pointed this out. (I only read the first few posts). It is possible to live beyond one's means—often for a relatively extended period of time—especially if relying on credit cards and/or loans from family/friends.
And from what I understand, there IS a story that's unfolding under the surface, but it's not the case that no one has a clue about it, because I've heard from various individuals who pay attention to such things of a number of warning signs that an eventual "collapse" is eminent.
The article doesn't say they're not paying, it says they are paying more than they can afford, but perhaps someone else already pointed this out. (I only read the first few posts). It is possible to live beyond one's means—often for a relatively extended period of time—especially if relying on credit cards and/or loans from family/friends.
And from what I understand, there IS a story that's unfolding under the surface, but it's not the case that no one has a clue about it, because I've heard from various individuals who pay attention to such things of a number of warning signs that an eventual "collapse" is eminent.
According to Google (Capital One), here's the average:Some.people don't mind having a credit card with a balance of a few thousand at 28%