Half a billion in unrealized gains....

Up - Traders earn $$$$
Down - Traders earn more $$$$

Up - investors earn $$$$
Down - investors return all their profits.
Then they weep and gnash their teeth in dispair
 
How is SEC not looking into Roaring Kitty's account by now? It's obvious that he's pulling a fast one, namely pump and dump. I think my mama was right after all. Suckers are not born, they're made.

What'd he do? I still don't understand how posting an account is illegal. He literally said nothing about buying the stock.
 
What'd he do? I still don't understand how posting an account is illegal. He literally said nothing about buying the stock.
What? Are you that slow? What his account is showing might not be everything. I'm pretty sure he made many trades that he's not showing (or that he has other brokerage accounts in addition to the E*Trade account he's showing). For example, he is solely responsible for having orchestrated the rally in the last 2 weeks, so it makes sense for SEC to investigate whether he sold his positions during that time. In another word, if you use your power of influence for personal gain, that's considered pump and dump, period. SEC should definitely look into it.
 
Last edited:
Commingled accounts are actionable at retail if there is fund-backing. If he's backed by a fund then simply parking the money with him is manipulation as he's only posited the GME position to the public.
 
What? Are you that slow? What his account is showing might not be everything. I'm pretty sure he made many trades that he's not showing (or that he has other brokerage accounts in addition to the E*Trade account he's showing). For example, he is solely responsible for having orchestrated the rally in the last 2 weeks, so it makes sense for SEC to investigate whether he sold his positions during that time. In another word, if you use your power of influence for personal gain, that's considered pump and dump, period. SEC should definitely look into it.

Might not be everything?? Are you stupid?

You're making crazy assumptions. How do you make it through life in fantasy land? You have no clue what he did and neither do I. Get help. You are nuts.
 
Commingled accounts are actionable at retail if there is fund-backing. If he's backed by a fund then simply parking the money with him is manipulation as he's only posited the GME position to the public.

Where's the proof? I don't operate on assumptions.
 
Unequal Long and Short Positions. Members must report any account or accounts acting "In Concert" that hold over 200 contracts on either the long call/short put (bullish) or the short call/long put (bearish) side of the market.

Here is the rule for options. It's part of LOPR report
 
Back
Top