Huh to what? QUOTE what you are "huhing" to. Oy!
How is SEC not looking into Roaring Kitty's account by now? It's obvious that he's pulling a fast one, namely pump and dump. I think my mama was right after all. Suckers are not born, they're made.
What? Are you that slow? What his account is showing might not be everything. I'm pretty sure he made many trades that he's not showing (or that he has other brokerage accounts in addition to the E*Trade account he's showing). For example, he is solely responsible for having orchestrated the rally in the last 2 weeks, so it makes sense for SEC to investigate whether he sold his positions during that time. In another word, if you use your power of influence for personal gain, that's considered pump and dump, period. SEC should definitely look into it.What'd he do? I still don't understand how posting an account is illegal. He literally said nothing about buying the stock.
What? Are you that slow? What his account is showing might not be everything. I'm pretty sure he made many trades that he's not showing (or that he has other brokerage accounts in addition to the E*Trade account he's showing). For example, he is solely responsible for having orchestrated the rally in the last 2 weeks, so it makes sense for SEC to investigate whether he sold his positions during that time. In another word, if you use your power of influence for personal gain, that's considered pump and dump, period. SEC should definitely look into it.
Commingled accounts are actionable at retail if there is fund-backing. If he's backed by a fund then simply parking the money with him is manipulation as he's only posited the GME position to the public.
That wasn't to you
Where's the proof? I don't operate on assumptions.