Hairdresser = Zero substance

Quote from monty21:

Hairdresser...

This guy is the most disruptive, one-liner, ET member. It's individuals like these that hurt this site. He never gives anything of substance and just trolls every thread with negativity.

I took the time to do this (http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/search.php?s=&action=showresults&searchid=2995269). Here are his last 15 (consecutive) posts... Judge the substance for yourself:

1. "He's a boob.

+40% is a rally."


2. "LOL.

Laffer was one of the Goldilocks boys.

He is a joke."


3. "Buy buy buy.

Rowshan has been short since the first week in April."


4. "Buy buy buy."


5. "Still short then?"


6. "Still short?"


7." Roger Nightengale is a Quack.

Who says to buy stocks if we are going into a multi-year Depression.

What a Moron.

Markets are strong, Obama is very strong."


8. "ET posts very wrong again."


9. "The Mods here are Perma Bears too.

No wonder, I'm outta here.

You all just missed a 40% and going higher rally.

U suck..."


10. "Canceling subscription after years...

It is a worthless rag now.

Mike Santoli brings nothing to the table and Abelson is bearish ALWAYS.

Never make a dime from them.

In the bin it goes, along with CNBc."


11. "Nice Parting gift from Hank Paulson."


12. "He doesn't make money, no point in formulating an answer."


13. "Fox is for Cretins.

http://www.bartcop.com/league-democracies.jpg"


14. "Why do we do it so often?"


15. "Still short?"

we also have a few ETers who do nothing but start threads for shock value. crgarcia was one. Dunno if still doing it, as I put him on ignore a couple months ago.
 
Freaky. Accounts being banned for 'no substance'...Is there a new sheriff in town? :eek:

Cursory check, says nothing wrong with that post round up.

Round up 10 of anyone's posts and see how coherent they sound. This is ET, not the RAND think tank!
 
Quote from satchel:

Freaky. Accounts being banned for 'no substance'...Is there a new sheriff in town? :eek:

Cursory check, says nothing wrong with that post round up.

Round up 10 of anyone's posts and see how coherent they sound. This is ET, not the RAND think tank!

Since you mention it I was a little surprised at the banning too.

Even though I have Hairdresser on my ignore list and cannot imagine gleaning any useful information from the bitches posts. I can't recall seeing anything worthy of banning, unless of course Baron plans on banning half of ET's members (most likely including lil'o beer drinker me).
 
Back
Top