Haircut of Canadian treasury bills used as collateral

Fuck off dude, this is MY thread, open a different thread if you like. You rudely hijacked my thread and don't comprehend how tbills are being traded at IB. I repeatedly asked you very politely to get off my thread and take your different question elsewhere which you selfishly ignored. You clearly don't know what you are talking about.

M.W.: I don't mean to be rude; but mrblueguy, BobG, and others are very helpful and understand the subject matter and the issue at hand, while you demonstrate with each of your posts that you don't. You are even disputing what mrblueguy and myself tested and saw with our own eyes!!
This is an internet forum. If you have an issue with us discussing this matter which is important to us, then you might want to consider hosting your own web forum.
 
How it was described in the IB message was EXACTLY as I described to you. To the dot. I told you and your buddy many times that any margin requirements in the futures account can and are first satisfied by available cash in the futures account, then cash in the securities account then by collateral in the securities account. If you don't have sufficient cash to satisfy the margin requirements then you may still be able to satisfy the margin requirement itself through collateral such as tbills but still get charged financing rates for lending you cash. Which part is still unclear?

You're not following me. There's 2 trades, not 1:

#1 is the tbills (cash goes to zero)
#2 is Futures options with margin of 44k (cash goes to -44k)

There's so little content out there on this topic and you're not helping. Me and tradegoodstocks do this and are trying to show other's how this works. You don't seem to have any first hand experience with this, but seem sure we are doing something different from what we are saying instead of taking the info at face value.

Attached is the holy grail. I finally someone from IB to admit this is what's going on.
 
Nobody is getting a free lunch. You are an idiot.

I just want to thank tradegoodstocks and others for posting about their experience with this. I was actually in the process giving up on IB and moving elsewhere based on IB customer service saying that IB does not allow this. tradegoodstocks gave me the confidence to go ahead and give it a try in spite of IB saying its not allowed. And behold it is working!! I'm getting thousands of $ of extra income now without any downside. I owe you guys a beer.

I joined this forum just to help lay this to rest and hopefully help other's on this frustrating topic.

If anyone is still unsure, all I can say is just give it a try. Put some T bills and futures in an account and what your interest charges are. If you set up the test correctly, you should easily see if your getting a free lunch or not. I am.
 
I am interested in Canadian tbills which is the Original Topic of this thread, created by myself. If you have other things to discuss perhaps it should be you to move elsewhere.

M.W. : You might want to unsubscribe from this thread if you're no longer interested in the topic.
 
You are simply incorrect. Infrequently (not at every moment in time) small orders of tbills are looked at and processed (whether via algorithm or human I can't tell) and regardless of whether you place a limit inside the best bid/ask or at the ask gets processed. You can test this for yourself by placing a buy limit above the best ask and you still won't get immediately filled. The reason is the small order size. Also this is ilthe OTC not a listed marker. I am very active in investing cash in tbills for many months now and got many times filled better than ask.

Good to know, thank you. I have not bought many T-bills yet; I'm just getting started. I typically got an immediate fill at IB when I put in a limit order at the best ask per Fidelity for my order quantity. I will try putting in a limit slightly higher than the mid price next time and then wait. That is what you are suggesting, right?
 
Of course it has more benefits. It is beneficial at the moment to not let a single dollar cash sit in your account and to instead invest in tbills. Gets you close to 4.75% in return. Cash gets you signicantly less (as function of account balance) . So, even if your margin requirements are 50000 dollars and you have another ADDITIONAL 50000 dollars sitting around in cash it makes sense to purchase tbills.

More than? What cash balance exactly? I might not be following you, but the whole point here is to buy tbills in whatever amount your futures maintence margin requirement is. anything more than that does not have any special benefit.

Have you typically been running a positive cash balance in this account (earning credit interest)? if so, you should be able to buy bills up to the value of your maintenance without affecting daily accrued interest payable.
 
I am interested in Canadian tbills which is the Original Topic of this thread, created by myself. If you have other things to discuss perhaps it should be you to move elsewhere.

I reread your OP and see that you asked about using canadian bills for collateral for your unspecified trades at IB. Those of us who are interested in using governments (not just canadian) specifically for collateral for futures trades at IB have been having a valuable and IMHO on-topic discussion in this thread.

I gather from your comments that you don't trade futures at IB so don't care about this issue. I assume that you don't care about the original question anymore either since you posted that you found a solution to your issue. However, for some reason, it seems to bother you that people are posting in this thread about this topic. If it's annoying to get the notices that someone posted, you can turn those off.

BTW, I've been participating in internet discussion boards since long before the web existed (e.g. usenet) It's never been a convention that the thread starter gets to regulate who is allowed to post on "his" thread.
 
Last edited:
Infrequently (not at every moment in time) small orders of tbills are looked at and processed (whether via algorithm or human I can't tell) and regardless of whether you place a limit inside the best bid/ask or at the ask gets processed. You can test this for yourself by placing a buy limit above the best ask and you still won't get immediately filled. The reason is the small order size. Also this is the OTC not a listed market. I am very active in investing cash in tbills for many months now and got many times filled better than ask.

This is consistent with my experience trading treasuries at IB. I don't think it's limited to small orders or t-bills. I've found that I don't get an instant fill even if I try to lift the entire ask size. IB customer service is, of course, useless in explaining why I haven't been filled. Apparently, the electronic quotes they are showing don't have to be real.

This kind of info possibly makes it worthwhile to read posts by someone with such an immense amount of attitude based on their "many months" of experience.
 
This is consistent with my experience trading treasuries at IB. I don't think it's limited to small orders or t-bills. I've found that I don't get an instant fill even if I try to lift the entire ask size. IB customer service is, of course, useless in explaining why I haven't been filled. Apparently, the electronic quotes they are showing don't have to be real.

This kind of info possibly makes it worthwhile to read posts by someone with such an immense amount of attitude based on their "many months" of experience.

The reason why you don't get a fill when you put in a buy order at the ASK that IB indicates, might be that your order quantity is less than the minimum quantity of that ASK quote. IB doesn't show the minimum quantities of the order book. I usually go to Fidelity to get an idea what the order book with the minimum quantities looks like. (But my understanding is that each broker has their own order book for T-bills, so the Fidelity order book might not be 100% the same as IB's order book.) Please note that when I say minimum quantities, it's not a typo. T-bill quotes have minimums that the counterparty (dealers or institutions) can specify. That's different from the order size in the equity markets, which are maximums. I learned all that just recently.
I also understand that retail orders are not visible to other retail customers. You can only trade with the selected dealers at IB.
 
Last edited:
a) nothing in any of my posts indicates that I do not trade futures (a pure assumption on your end)

b) my issue has not been settled as you can gather from Dave's response early on in the thread. (again and assumption on your end)

c) It does not bother me at all if others posted ON TOPIC. You and a few others DON'T. Instead the discussion revolves around "free lunches" and all sorts of other misconceptions of how t-bills are traded at IB, how margin requirements are satisfied, how cash is swept between different accounts to earn interest for clients. I can't count the wrong statements on each of the past 5 pages.

d) You posted here 37 times since 2006, could it perhaps be you who is not really up to date on how threads are handled here at ET? According to my understanding and something many confirmed here over time there should be a basic respect regarding the original topic; you instead made it all about futures margin requirements when the thread topic was about Canadian and European t-bills. And you have the audacity to suggest that the topics are related because both relate to government securities.

Pretty narrowminded in my book.

But I am glad your issues have been resolved, the experts have exchanged their goodies and can now safely go back to trade. Am I about right?

I reread your OP and see that you asked about using canadian bills for collateral for your unspecified trades at IB. Those of us who are interested in using governments (not just canadian) specifically for collateral for futures trades at IB have been having a valuable and IMHO on-topic discussion in this thread.

I gather from your comments that you don't trade futures at IB so don't care about this issue. I assume that you don't care about the original question anymore either since you posted that you found a solution to your issue. However, for some reason, it seems to bother you that people are posting in this thread about this topic. If it's annoying to get the notices that someone posted, you can turn those off.

BTW, I've been participating in internet discussion boards since long before the web existed (e.g. usenet) It's never been a convention that the thread starter gets to regulate who is allowed to post on "his" thread.
 
Back
Top