Warren has beat the mkt for the last 30 years, about 20%/yr average and survived two 50% drawdowns
Warren has beat the mkt for the last 30 years, about 20%/yr average and survived two 50% drawdowns
What is crazier is accepting wrong figures as right (not 20% : 16% per year vs 9.5% for the S&P).What's crazier is that when he touts that number it's BRK book value which is after corporate taxes are paid. SPX returns are pre-tax (or at best tax deferred).
This is correct...It will be hard to bet against Warren Buffett/BH... If only because of the fact that he's a big stack bully, to use the poker terminology.
For the record, my comment was just an observation, rather than judgement...This is correct...
it's no surprise that his buddy Obama quashed the Keystone...after all - how would that help Buffett's railroad investment?
If you bought BH 50 years ago, it's return compounds at an annual rate of 21.6%:What is crazier is accepting wrong figures as right (not 20% : 16% per year vs 9.5% for the S&P).
If you bought BH 50 years ago, it's return compounds at an annual rate of 21.6%:
http://fortune.com/2015/02/28/berkshire-after-50-years/
If you own it since the mid 80s, one A share costed ~$2,000 then and is ~$217,000 now.
If you were stupid and bought it just before the crash in 2007 @ $~150,000 peak, all time high, you are still ahead today @ ~$217,000.
I don't know how he did it but there are few others who can claim these numbers.
If it is so easy, name a few more investors who did as well or better than his track record back between 1950 and 1970.Ok but :
1 Money making was easy between 1950 and 1970 : you can't consider these figures.
