Gun Nuts - Gun Haters

[AAAintheBeltway]

I guess I have trouble with liberals who can invent a right in the constitution for gay sex but deny the plain meaning of the Second Amendment. They claim they want teh governemtn to keep out of the bedroom, but they are desperately obsessed to know if I have a gun in my bedside table. They think that gun violence justifies ignoring the constitution and invading myrights, but they have no stomach for sentencing actual criminals to long terms out of harm's way.

Guns are evil, the devil incarnate to them, and you are just fooling yourself if you think you cna have a reasonable debate over the subject. They have one goal and it is total confiscation. Anything else is just a waystation. That is why the NRA is correct to never compromise. We should not give an inch. The Second Amendment was not written to accommodate hunters and sport shooters, and claims that "reasonable" gun control will protect the "legitimate' interests of hunters and shooters are fraudulent attempts to start us down the slippery slope.

 

[ARogueTrader]

Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

I guess I have trouble with liberals who can invent a right in the constitution for gay sex but deny the plain meaning of the Second Amendment. They claim they want teh governemtn to keep out of the bedroom, but they are desperately obsessed to know if I have a gun in my bedside table. They think that gun violence justifies ignoring the constitution and invading myrights, but they have no stomach for sentencing actual criminals to long terms out of harm's way.

Guns are evil, the devil incarnate to them, and you are just fooling yourself if you think you cna have a reasonable debate over the subject. They have one goal and it is total confiscation. Anything else is just a waystation. That is why the NRA is correct to never compromise. We should not give an inch. The Second Amendment was not written to accommodate hunters and sport shooters, and claims that "reasonable" gun control will protect the "legitimate' interests of hunters and shooters are fraudulent attempts to start us down the slippery slope.

Things I've never hear of:

A child accidental picking up his gay aunt's dido and killing himself with it.

A dildo being used in a liquor store robbery and shooting, in which the dildo was stolen from a gay woman's house during a burglary.

A gay woman being accidental killed while cleaning his dildo.

A gay woman committing suicide with a dildo. (actually, this may have happened...although gerbils may also have been involved).

A gay woman killing her lover with a dildo.

A gay woman breaking into someone's house and killing people with her dildo.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Classic straw-man argument comparing gay rights to gun ownership.

You do love to bitch and whine, don't you?

 

[dougcs]

Quote from John Q. Public:




Maybe I have not made myself clear enough, so I'll try to do a better job. Gun owners seem to be able to see but one class of people on the other side of a firearm - "criminals". And while you may think that I should find comfort in the "fact" that "only" 10 to 15 percent of guns used in crimes are stolen from private law abiding citizens, it really is little comfort to me. I'd be thrilled to reduce my chances of having a bullet rip in to me from your stolen gun by such a percentage.

But herein lies the problem. The rest of us fear more than the so called criminal. We fear your kid getting his hands on your gun and shooting another one of your kids, or maybe one of mine, or maybe himself. We fear you, a man who has demonstrated what seems to be a radical change in personality even discussing the issue. We fear a domestic argument getting out of hand. We fear your losing it, and shooting up your work place.
{SNIP}

You seem to see only half the issue, consider England that has what is considered the "gold standard" of gun control and who was labelled by no less a liberal as Dan Rather as, "one of the most violent urban societies in the Western world."

Another from Dan Rather: "This summer, thousands of Americans will travel to Britain expecting a civilized island free from crime and ugliness ... [but now] the U.K. has a crime problem ... worse than ours."

This all happened after more stringent gun laws were passed.

This link will take you to one of many articles on the unintended consequence of more stringent gun control, namely more crime:

http://216.239.41.104/search?q=cach...ther+great+britain+gun+control&hl=en&ie=UTF-8[/url]

I live in Texas and while we have a reputation for lots of guns and lots of death penalties (both true), I feel safer on our Houston streets than on Washington DC's streets where guns are essentially banned by law.

DS

PS-rather than booting our bad Governor out of office, we send them to DC instead.

 

[ArchAngel]

Quote from ARogueTrader:

Things I've never hear of:

A dildo being used in a liquor store robbery and shooting, in which the dildo was stolen from a gay man's house during a burglary.

It only happens about 2% of the time, usually they're either purchased on the black market, stolen from a cop (in San Francisco, New York, or Minneapolis), or stolen from a sex toy store. When will these guys learn to keep their dildos in a safe when they're not in direct control of them?

A gay man being accidental killed while cleaning his dildo.

There was a recent case - some how it apparently slipped while he was cleaning it and it ruptured his prostate and died. Although this, like all "death while cleanings" are truly the ultimate Darwinian events and should be considered a good thing - we don't need those genes replicating.

A gay man committing suicide with a dildo.

Yeah, this happens from time to time - death is usually from asphyxiation - go figure.

A gay man killing his lover with a dildo.

When this happens, it's not pretty at all.

A gay man breaking into someone's house and killing people with his dildo.

The cops hate these cases - bludgoned to death with an 18" dildo is really ugly.

 

[facultus]

LMAO!!!!!

 

[Pabst]

You were funnier as Tampa.

 

[John Q. Public]

Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

I guess I have trouble with liberals who can invent a right in the constitution for gay sex but deny the plain meaning of the Second Amendment. They claim they want teh governemtn to keep out of the bedroom, but they are desperately obsessed to know if I have a gun in my bedside table. They think that gun violence justifies ignoring the constitution and invading myrights, but they have no stomach for sentencing actual criminals to long terms out of harm's way.

Guns are evil, the devil incarnate to them, and you are just fooling yourself if you think you cna have a reasonable debate over the subject. They have one goal and it is total confiscation. Anything else is just a waystation. That is why the NRA is correct to never compromise. We should not give an inch. The Second Amendment was not written to accommodate hunters and sport shooters, and claims that "reasonable" gun control will protect the "legitimate' interests of hunters and shooters are fraudulent attempts to start us down the slippery slope.

My dear AAA, rest assured that when I am King you may still keep a gun in/on your nightstand. My "liberal" reign will not prohibit such: however, you will be thrown in to the dungeon should another get hold of that gun and do harm to a third party. In the event the intruder uses the gun against you, I would not punish you further.

But be forewarned, that upon my ascending the throne, all my subjects will be required to attend gay sensitivity training, which I suspect would work a hardship on you and your kind.

 

[AnonymousTrader]

Picture two houses.

One house with a sign : "NO TO GUNS!!!!"

The other one, with an NRA banner.

Guess which is getting robbed?

 

[axeman]

ArchAngel handedly destroyed your weak argument with
excellent reasoning and solid logic, and all you can come
back with is your opinion that its inane?


This debate is already over. You lost.


peace

axeman

Quote from John Q. Public:



Is there any point in trying to have a discussion about lethal firearms with a man who insists on making inane comparisons with guns and automobiles? I think not.

I seriously misjudged your wisdom. logic, and rationality. I will not be likely to misjudge them in the future.

It is pointless to address such absurd arguments, so I won't.