I read this thread with interest as someone who once considered prop firms over banks.
I understand that there are people out there who want to be self-employed (and you are with a prop firm to a certain extent). But like any other guy out there who quit college ala bill gates, probability of success is very small.
Joining a bank simply ensures that your risk is lessened which should, automatically, mean that your returns are reduced. But I fail to see that given how banks pay upwards 5million for senior positions and 10-20 million for head of trading desks.
My question basically is whether a prop firm trader can earn that much after let's say 10 years at the firm. Because from what I've seen, the answer is no.
Before the flamers catch me on the probability of success portion, I'd like to say that being a top earner in a bank's trading floor is a small prob as well, but it is larger than being a bill gates in trading.
Also, nowadays, derivatives trading is a high leverage business and very tied into statistical arbitrage type of operation. I fail to see how you can do that job without even a basic undergrad degree. The only bank that used to buck this believe would be bear stearns (which apparently hired Greenberg's doorman into MBS!), well, look what happened to them.
So to all the guys who are insistent on prop firm position being better off for the original poster compared to GS (if he gets it), I think you are giving this young man the worst advice ever!
I understand that there are people out there who want to be self-employed (and you are with a prop firm to a certain extent). But like any other guy out there who quit college ala bill gates, probability of success is very small.
Joining a bank simply ensures that your risk is lessened which should, automatically, mean that your returns are reduced. But I fail to see that given how banks pay upwards 5million for senior positions and 10-20 million for head of trading desks.
My question basically is whether a prop firm trader can earn that much after let's say 10 years at the firm. Because from what I've seen, the answer is no.
Before the flamers catch me on the probability of success portion, I'd like to say that being a top earner in a bank's trading floor is a small prob as well, but it is larger than being a bill gates in trading.
Also, nowadays, derivatives trading is a high leverage business and very tied into statistical arbitrage type of operation. I fail to see how you can do that job without even a basic undergrad degree. The only bank that used to buck this believe would be bear stearns (which apparently hired Greenberg's doorman into MBS!), well, look what happened to them.
So to all the guys who are insistent on prop firm position being better off for the original poster compared to GS (if he gets it), I think you are giving this young man the worst advice ever!