Quote from Pekelo:
Yes, it is a better deal for services, but there are disadvantages for that too. Old costumers get pissed off. Suddenly it is harder to book the service, longer waiting period and the groupon users even paid less! Old costumers would like to see the same appreciation for their continuous support of the service, not the different treatment for the same....
Another thing is that competition is already there and really easy to start. Back when Amazon started, to start a company like that with storehouses all over the country required huge starting capital. So competition was limited by it. To start a similar website like Groupon it only takes a few employees and a webserver...
Going back to the Ponzi charge. I guess there are 2 Ponzis. One where there is no service or product whatsoever and it is a straight out fraud. The other kind start out as a normal business (just like Madoff) but then the owner realizes that the business will not run as it was intended, and he turns it into a ponzi. Groupon is the later kind...
Let's repeat, almost 1 billion was taken out by early investors already. And the website is losing money. If they believed in it and wanted it to suceed, shouldn't they have left the money in???