Gross receipts tax to state?

This is getting interesting...and my guess is that any state tax rep is less informed than the IRS, or for that matter, any of the thread participants here.

The suits just want their cut, no matter how they get it. Throw a wide net, as it were...
 
NM isn't mentioned much as a hotbed of activity for hedge or other money mgmt businesses. Maybe you hit on the reason! :eek: :p

Surely. And what worries me a bit is that NM is not as 'fashion-forward' as IL either (where I'm more familiar with), in regards to contemporary tax applications and state provisions for the trading industry. The trading industry and it's interests are much better represented at the state level in IL as well as helping to fight for precedents in tax courts.
 
I might have misremembered. Pub 550 refers to it as "ordinary gains", as opposed to ordinary income.

However I've never heard of "capital income." What is the IRS definition of 'capital income'?

Sorry for not properly understanding your situation, but you had not stated that as a trader you had made the mark to market selection.

All the traders that I know/have known are Schedule D and Form 6781 types.

Mark to market treatment makes no sense for me or any of the traders that I have known.

"capital income" is long term or short term capital gains as opposed to ordinary income.

You are going to have to contact The New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Dept and find out what their policies are for traders in your sitouation.
 
Surely. And what worries me a bit is that NM is not as 'fashion-forward' as IL either (where I'm more familiar with), in regards to contemporary tax applications and state provisions for the trading industry. The trading industry and it's interests are much better represented at the state level in IL as well as helping to fight for precedents in tax courts.

Dude, The CME is in Chicago. Way back when, it was Dan Rostenkowsky who was part of the original Daley machine/regime that got the futures industry it's 60/40 tax treatment as a permanent (until it isn't ) part of the IRS tax code!
 
Dude, The CME is in Chicago. Way back when, it was Dan Rostenkowsky who was part of the original Daley machine/regime that got the futures industry it's 60/40 tax treatment as a permanent (until it isn't ) part of the IRS tax code!

Haha, that's a good example. :D

NM? Well, we have blue meth. :p
 
Dude, The CME is in Chicago. Way back when, it was Dan Rostenkowsky who was part of the original Daley machine/regime that got the futures industry it's 60/40 tax treatment as a permanent (until it isn't ) part of the IRS tax code!

Keep in mind that the 60/40 treatment for futures didn't come out of thin air. It was the compromise reached for ending the very favorable treatment of tax straddles.

If the CME and other exchanges did't have lobbyists they would be taxed and regulated to death.
 
You are going to have to contact The New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Dept and find out what their policies are for traders in your sitouation.

The problem is that no one will know what he is talking about. And I bet he'll hear different information each time he calls in. This is an esoteric question that probably only a few people have to deal with in their lifetimes. To expect the NM Revenue Dept to know what is going on is to expect a miracle. I would consult a tax professional who specializes in trading, like GreenTraderTax. They can probably tell you within a few minutes what sort of path you'll need to take/look for. And I suspect the original poster is just going to have to deal with getting audited over this type of thing, maybe multiple times, because of its obscurity/complexity.
 
Keep in mind that the 60/40 treatment for futures didn't come out of thin air. It was the compromise reached for ending the very favorable treatment of tax straddles.

If the CME and other exchanges did't have lobbyists they would be taxed and regulated to death.

Then it's our patriotic duty to pay the increasing data and execution fees! :D
 
Back
Top