Hi Lescor,
I Just wanted to say thanks for this thread. I read it from the beginning and found it very informative. I hope the rest of the year improves for you after your first quarter. We all have some of the same issues with the markets.
I trade my multiple strategies with stocks in multiple time frames like you do. But that is where the similarities end. I believe I am somewhat the opposite of you because all I can do is write code and trade automation (retired from 35 years in IT). Automation I can handle great. But I limit my discretionary trading.
One of the best things about your thread is your method for implementing new strategies. It is very similar to the way they do in IT. The rule there is test it for structural errors, test and debug it with case data, test it separately with various amounts of real data, review the strategy test as a pass or fail, then some stress test it and if it goes through alright put it into production and lastly monitor the trading results closely for a specified period of time. After that it is a live strategy to trade any time until it does not meet its specs for a specified period of time. Then it is a rewrite or the trash heap. They call this the life-cycle of the software (strategy).
I do have one question though that I donât think was asked before, if you have time to answer.
Does volume play any role In prequalifying your securities or in the actual strategies themselves?
Thanks.
P.S. I love to travel over to Canada. I do it all throughout the year to Windsor and Sarnia.