Quote from lescor:
I add to positions as the odds of them being profitable increases, it's part of the system.
I rarely add to winning trades.
I've been thinking about what you have said and I'm having a hard time imagining such a strategy. What I can think of is a pairs spread diverging from its mean, then I could say "odds are getting better" the further it diverges. Or, maybe a triangle formation, where one might say, the longer volatility stays low in the corner, the better are the odds it will shoot big (not sure though).
Normally, odds of a setup being profitable are an average value and determined from backtesting or from ones experience, right? One can't say "this gap is twice as big as an average gap, therefore my odds are also twice as better". Or can he?
In other words, one can know, this setup is profitable 60% of time, but can he objectively judge quality of a setup?
Maybe somebody can provide better examples of a (well known) strategy there one can be sure odds of a setup being profitable are increasing with passage of certain events and are not fixed (excluding options strategies)?