Why be surprised? New York University's academic reputation is *already* bad.
Quote from Madison:
Barron's apparently asked him directly to respond.
He claims he doesn't have time to refute serious allegations from a major publication with a large circulation, because he's "traveling"?
Come on.
So the potentially falsified or bogus credentials of a Fed chairman are irrelevant, whereas a former president who chose to share a cigar with a willing intern in a decidedly non-traditional way is a scoundrel? Admittedly, neither fellow would win a good deed award for such conduct, but which one's deception had a potentially larger and more meaningful effect on a very large number of people? (Performance notwithstanding, particularly since Greenspan's performance has been suspect by most thinking people.)Quote from Maverickz:
Who cares?
Bill Clinton was a gun grabbing piece of shit.Quote from Thunderdog:
So the potentially falsified or bogus credentials of a Fed chairman are irrelevant, whereas a former president who chose to share a cigar with a willing intern in a decidedly non-traditional way is a scoundrel? Admittedly, neither fellow would win a good deed award for such conduct, but which one's deception had a potentially larger and more meaningful effect on a very large number of people? (Performance notwithstanding, particularly since Greenspan's performance has been suspect by most thinking people.)
add hearsay to hearsay and what is coming out is notQuote from Madison:
Barron's apparently asked him directly to respond.
He claims he doesn't have time to refute serious allegations from a major publication with a large circulation, because he's "traveling"?
Come on.