Did you have something to say after this?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Greenpeace co-founder: No scientific proof humans dominant cause of warming climate
- Thread starter JamesL
- Start date
Did you have something to say after this?
I repeat, anyone who does not believe in AGW IS AN IDIOT. I don't care if they were head of Greenpeace or a douchebag meteorologist like Bastardi. They are idiots.
Hey Shit-for-brains! NOAA's Climate Prediction Center fucked up this winter. Bastardy nailed it month after month... I know because I observed it as I followed his monthly forecasts...and ironically, he used CLIMATE data to reach his forecast conclusions. He also considered ocean cycles...the climate center apparently did not, you dumbfuck brainwashed bought and paid for rag-picker...
You have a mirror? Go see who the douchebag is. Keep posting, though. It's fun watching you make a bigger fool of yourself every time you open your asshole mouth.
Post edit: I'm still waiting for you to tell us all how you've reduced your carbon footprint and what additional sacrifices you'll make in YOUR own life regarding AGW. The crickets have multiplied since I last asked you.
Go educate yourself instead of pretending you're knowledgeable with your cutting and pasting.
http://www.weatherbell.com/
Your logic is fraudulent.
Your "facts" are misrepresentations.
Greenhouse gases also cool.
Why do you keep posting such anti scientific shit. Do you enjoy being a troll?
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.
No you are wrong asshole Greenhouse gasses don't cool. You have no science. Only lies and bullshit.
Saying greenhouse gasses cool is like saying up is down. You are fucked in the head.
Hey Shit-for-brains! NOAA's Climate Prediction Center fucked up this winter. Bastardy nailed it month after month... I know because I observed it as I followed his monthly forecasts...and ironically, he used CLIMATE data to reach his forecast conclusions. He also considered ocean cycles...the climate center apparently did not, you dumbfuck brainwashed bought and paid for rag-picker...
You have a mirror? Go see who the douchebag is. Keep posting, though. It's fun watching you make a bigger fool of yourself every time you open your asshole mouth.
Post edit: I'm still waiting for you to tell us all how you've reduced your carbon footprint and what additional sacrifices you'll make in YOUR own life regarding AGW. The crickets have multiplied since I last asked you.
Go educate yourself instead of pretending you're knowledgeable with your cutting and pasting.
http://www.weatherbell.com/
Bastard eee is an idiot. Like you. So of course you think he is great.
"Joe Bastardi is âthe chief hurricane and long-range forecaster at AccuWeather and a national bodybuilding competitor.â I canât speak to his physical strength but he bench-presses a staggering amount of anti-science disinformation (see âJoe Bastardi canât read a temperature anomaly mapâ).
To switch metaphors, he has now snowed his readers with a blizzard of inane predictions.
At StageCollege.com, his piece, âThe Weather Year of a Lifetime,â argues he will never live to see another summer like this one. At his European blog, he says, âAnd for the ministers of propaganda on this matter that donât understand how this works, you will see NEXT SUMMER has the highest amount of sea ice since the early part of last decade.â Seriously!
His predictions are based on his love of the satellite temperature data, which he simply doesnât understand.
http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2010/...-range-forecaster-accuweather-global-warming/
Bastard eee is an idiot. Like you. So of course you think he is great.
"Joe Bastardi is âthe chief hurricane and long-range forecaster at AccuWeather and a national bodybuilding competitor.â I canât speak to his physical strength but he bench-presses a staggering amount of anti-science disinformation (see âJoe Bastardi canât read a temperature anomaly mapâ).
To switch metaphors, he has now snowed his readers with a blizzard of inane predictions.
At StageCollege.com, his piece, âThe Weather Year of a Lifetime,â argues he will never live to see another summer like this one. At his European blog, he says, âAnd for the ministers of propaganda on this matter that donât understand how this works, you will see NEXT SUMMER has the highest amount of sea ice since the early part of last decade.â Seriously!
His predictions are based on his love of the satellite temperature data, which he simply doesnât understand.
http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2010/...-range-forecaster-accuweather-global-warming/
Fair enough. We'll take him out of the equation. I agree he's not a climate scientist. His degree is in meteorology, and that's where he should keep his opinions. If he's getting paid by companies for his forecasts, they must think he's getting it right. I think he's done a good job forecasting this winters cold. I'll leave it at that.
Now, with him out of the mix, explain how Noaa's Climate model for this winter failed so miserably (for the record, I have great respect for Noaa). Their Nov, Dec, Jan forecast was way off the mark. Explain why if a short range forecast (relatively speaking) can be so wrong, why longer range forecasts can be trusted.
I'm still waiting for you to post a list of your personal sacrifices in the pursuit of a cooler planet. I've stated mine several times. I'm beginning to suspect some hypocrisy on your part, just like the alarmists who leave the biggest carbon print possible when they go on their missions to preach about everyone else's.
once again fraudcurrents flat out lies.
How many times do I have to quote NASA science to explain that CO2 in the atmosphere reflects some of the sun's energy back into space. And that NASA scientists explain CO2 is a powerful coolant.
from the NASA study...
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.
How many times do I have to quote NASA science to explain that CO2 in the atmosphere reflects some of the sun's energy back into space. And that NASA scientists explain CO2 is a powerful coolant.
from the NASA study...
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.
once again fraudcurrents flat out lies.
How many times do I have to quote NASA science to explain that CO2 in the atmosphere reflects some of the sun's energy back into space. And that NASA scientists explain CO2 is a powerful coolant.
from the NASA study...
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.
Trying to logically explain things to a Retarded Parrot - who just continually spouts nonsensical warming alarmist propaganda over & over - is a painful exercise in futility.
once again fraudcurrents flat out lies.
How many times do I have to quote NASA science to explain that CO2 in the atmosphere reflects some of the sun's energy back into space. And that NASA scientists explain CO2 is a powerful coolant.
from the NASA study...
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/22mar_saber/
For the three day period, March 8th through 10th, the thermosphere absorbed 26 billion kWh of energy. Infrared radiation from CO2 and NO, the two most efficient coolants in the thermosphere, re-radiated 95% of that total back into space.
No it doesn't. You have no science showing CO2 cools the planet. It's akin to saying up is down. You are very fucked up.
Trying to logically explain things to a Retarded Parrot - who just continually spouts nonsensical warming alarmist propaganda over & over - is a painful exercise in futility.
There is no logic. Jerm is trying to say that CO2 in our atmosphere cools the planet. Only a total idiot would say such a thing. And of course you would find the truth about AGW painful. You are also an idiot.