Greenpeace co-founder actually never founded Greenpeace

[jem]

more crap from from the leftist troll drone.
before you are acting like I was lying...

are you that stupid... predicting where polls really are is an opinion.
lying is ... you can keep your doctor.
you payments will go down etc.

Going into the storm the race was virtually tied. go back and check the polls and the margin for error.
one or two even had Romney ahead.

Apologize for insulting 'leftists' when they showed you the facts that Romney was going to lose.

You held on to your delusions while insulting others .

Are you too thick to know that?

Go read this thread that you started and start counting how many times you insulted others for telling you the truth - http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?t=240772


Now back to topic - explain to me how somebody can 'found' something after it has been in existence for a year.

 

[exGOPer]

more crap from from the leftist troll drone.
before you are acting like I was lying...

are you that stupid... predicting where polls really are is an opinion.
lying is ... you can keep your doctor.
you payments will go down etc.

Going into the storm the race was virtually tied. go back and check the polls and the margin for error.
one or two even had Romney ahead.

Oh look, the Con who has been consistently wrong is back to be wrong again.

Nate Silver having access to the same polls that you did predicted the race to a tee, what the fuck did you do you trollwad?

You got it wrong while anyone who pointed it out got insulted by you.

And you have yet to answer the co-founder issue.

 

[exGOPer]

can you read the greenpeace founders page --- you leftist fascist drones. ..
they avoid the issue of naming specific founders.

They name the four founders, rest get a mention for being on a boat. Read the words you maroon, not just the title.

 

[jem]

hey einstein it was a binary outcome. being right once or twice means nothing. come back and talk to us when he has been right 20 elections in a row.
(also many people said Silver had access to the Obama campaigns internal polling info)

by the way his picks are not so hot when he tries to spread out into other fields... so for now we have no idea if it was obama's numbers that got it right or if he has any skill at all.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/nate-silver-s-seven-most-memorable-predictions

otherwise more bullshit... most of the time I had very civil discourse with AK 47... except when he stated attempting to argue polls were predicting the outcome of events months away.

Which is the same boneheaded mistake you make.

are you him?

as far as the co founder issue... it is decided... greenpeace declines to pick a specific co founder so when a guy on the initial committee and long time president says he was the founder... you have presented no info for why a leftist drone like you has standing to challenge him. Once again... this is what greenpeace says...

"There's a joke that in any bar in Vancouver, Canada, you can sit down next to someone who claims to have founded Greenpeace. In fact, there was no single founder: name, idea, spirit and tactics can all be said to have separate lineages. Yet, some people clearly stand out. Here are four of them"

Oh look, the Con who has been consistently wrong is back to be wrong again.

Nate Silver having access to the same polls that you did predicted the race to a tee, what the fuck did you do you trollwad?

You got it wrong while anyone who pointed it out got insulted by you.

And you have yet to answer the co-founder issue.

 

[jem]

you need to learn how to read.... I will take away the surrounding words so you can focus...

...
In fact, there was no single founder: name, idea, spirit and tactics can all be said to have separate lineages. ..."

they then mention 4 people who stand out and the committee

They name the four founders, rest get a mention for being on a boat. Read the words you maroon, not just the title.