it is year ending and all institutions have to declare accounts and performance so they try to window dressNovember is historically a pretty damn bullish month
.However is it possible to predict(must not be 100% correct) when a market would be range bound(direction is irrelevant), more than 50% of the time?
Can tools like implied volatility, volume-order flow, T.A indicators be used to objectively(prove/research/backtest) predict significant greater than 50-50 a range bound market existence or persistence?
Mr Agi1, do you get the constant urge to feel vindicated (eg. need to be right)? Trying to predict the market, especially if you're a beginner, is a futile attempt. The market won't let you anyway. But if you allow yourself to follow the market instead, it might let you in on the detail.It is difficult to prove that anyone or tool can predict the market price direction consistently over long periods of time. That is have a win rate significantly greater than 50/50. And for those who can, or tools that can, such information is obviously not publicly know.
However is it possible to predict(must not be 100% correct) when a market would be range bound(direction is irrelevant), more than 50% of the time?
Can tools like implied volatility, volume-order flow, T.A indicators be used to objectively(prove/research/backtest) predict significant greater than 50-50 a range bound market existence or persistence?