No it won't.....Despite the 50 million lines of code, Windows XP is pretty "stupid". It doesn't even know you are running a realtime piece of software for instance.Quote from dcraig:
That is exactly right. I'm especially cautious about running anything as a real time process. There is a misconception on this thread that REALTIME means fast. It does not. It means having a defined maximum response time. The OS will throw whatever is needed at it to achieve this goal.
It rarely, if EVER, does this....especially if you have a modern CPU. It's an emergency-only situation.From the web site it seems that this piece of software monitors whatever it has elevated to real time and demotes it if it seems to be using too much CPU. Now this is just plain wrong - it's either realtime or it isn't. In other words this product is trying to be another scheduler on top of Windows kernel scheduler.
But they did not design windows for realtime usage in mind.Judging from the web site and some of the outlandish claims, it is not credible to me that this stuff supplants the work of generations of computer scientists who have studied and developed OS schedulers - ever since operating systems became more than just a simple program loader.
Just test it for a few days....that makes sense, right ? I've been at realtime for 2 weeks...no crashes, no problems. Quotes and charts were current even yesterday afternoon.There is nothing wrong with adjusting process priorities to improve response times - indeed it can be good practice to do so. But stay away from REALTIME unless there is a good reason to use it, and you know what you are doing.
