Gotta love ZERO RISK in the SP500 = $$$

Not interested in arguing. There is no point. As for a long bias, I do my best to leave bias trades to others. That seems to work for me, both ways.

Your "consideration" of an inside day is misguided according to many sources btw. Here is one such source...

"Inside days can be indicative of indecision in the market for a security, causing little price movement relative to the previous trading days. However, when several inside days occur consecutively, there is a higher probability that the stock will soon break out of its trading range, as a continuously dwindling price range is unsustainable. How it breaks out, though, cannot be determined solely by candlesticks showing inside days."

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/inside-days.asp

Finally a post I can understand. :)

My best setup is a volatility breakout, ideally a test of it, and the chart has a very distinct formation. Right now we are on the “long only” side of it, but it can sputter out at any given time, including tonight or tomorrow.
 
Isn't the idea of inside days, as defined above, a bit more murky when it comes to an index of all stocks, not just 1?

The inside "pattern" can appear on all time-based charts, regardless of the underlying.

Personally, I don't use candlesticks or candlestick patterns. However inside and outside days are unique, in that they are 2 of only 10 possible formations of adjacent pairs of price bars. When used with volume, today, the inside day, ES volume was 65% of the previous day... depending on ones style and method of analysis, given that input from the DAILY chart, "something" is being indicated.
 
Ridiculously low? After a 10% drop?

Wonder how ridiculously low stocks will be when the markets are down 33%


Billionaire Sam Zell says he is buying some ‘ridiculously low’ stocks in the wild market swings
PUBLISHED THU, MAR 5 20209:42 AM EST

Matthew J. Belvedere@MATT_BELVEDERE




https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/05/sam...ulously-low-stocks-in-wild-market-swings.html

Didn't read the attached article, but late last year Zell went on record that he was buying beaten down energy sector names. Contrary to widespread belief, there are sectors that have been annihilated during the blow off highs. Just look at OXY, SLB, RIG, HAL, etc. as an example.
 
Didn't read the attached article, but late last year Zell went on record that he was buying beaten down energy sector names. Contrary to widespread belief, there are sectors that have been annihilated during the blow off highs. Just look at OXY, SLB, RIG, HAL, etc. as an example.



I can't believe how hated this sector is, seems like its years and years away from coming back into favor.
 
Back
Top