Come on now though... the PnL can be derived a whole lot of different ways. 1 point on 20 contracts is exactly the same at 20 points on 1 contract. If you ask me, days where the ES barely moves are exactly the types of days to fade highs and lows and capture a few points very successfully. Perhaps a few points doesn't jive with your system, but many trades live off of making a few points per trade.Yeah man, everything is relative in trading. Given two products A and B, traders should optimize their trading by selecting the product that is going to provide the most follow through in p&l and the least amount of adverse variance and by selecting the inferior of the two, it represents an opportunity cost to the trader that really can't be recovered. You can pretend that your goal is to trade a product that doesn't move, but that is not that the correct way to think about it. For even if your goal is trade something that does not move, you have still have to account for adverse variance in which this product fails miserably. It's a free country and you are entitled to do what you want of course, it's just purely illogical. Which is not a crime, just bad trading. In my defense, the title of this thread is not "watching paint dry".
Looking at the chart of SPX that goes back 18 months and seeing no real gains would be a laugh for them because it simply wouldn't matter.
It makes no sense for you to say its bad trading. You make it sound like the only two trades that you saw in SPY over the past 18 months was to go long above 2100 or short below 1825, and ya, both of those trades would suck, but there is plenty to work with in the middle.