Yeah, right...I suppose if we all are willing to give back 100+ points in open equity on index longs then none of us would ever have a "bad call" either...i.e. your pissing on Recession2016's chart at the first swing highs in early November...
If I can just give out vague "levels" and then imply that I'm long or short and that I'll endure big equity swings, I can be a chat board guru as well...
Give it up, man.
I rarely do what I did with AAPL, but I wanted to help that guy, so I posted a call with precision to do so.
Check the screenshot:
1) Was when I spoke on tuesday past the close, with full details, ET has the timestamps, 8:10PM
2) Was the HOD on wed, the area I suggested for short, with 11 cent precision on a 118 $ stock.
3) Was the LOD on thur, the area I suggested that needed STUDY for further action and precisely when I posted "you are welcome" as a followup on the thread (3:15PM) when it was hit, whether that meant take profits or reverse, is too vague to tell because I did not talk past that and since I don't make hindsight calls I won't tell you what I actually did there (ask him what PM i sent him there though

), but the call for the short, which was the topic of the thread, was spot on but since you don't like me, you will talk shit, well talk shit asswipe, I don't care, my superior skills wont degrade because of you
You call that lack of details?
Have fun discrediting the above!
PS: BTW, Visaria said he wanted 116, I said at 114-114.50 we study, low of the week was 114.20s.