I am not trading mean reversion; as stated it is mostly a hedge and based on my interpretation of the what is likely to drive the markets going forward.And you're trading the "mean reversion"? If so, then why not keep adding to your short?
I get this queasy feeling that the Fed will hike .25 in Dec (maybe a bit of a sell-off and buy the dip) and then we go to Jan and Feb and March...each of these months they play out a "fear" that the Fed might hike again but it doesn't happen and the market rallies each time on more inaction. Maybe another hike of .25 around March or April and then the same thing each month through the summer?
One scenario I could see would be ES heading to 2110 to start a double top.
I use to laugh about this over and over again back in the day when I was monitoring amateur comments regarding price action.
Let me see, so everytime a higher low is made in an uptrend whenever we move to try make a higher high, we call it a potential double top?
Feel free to do as you wish, but we got "magnets" that take us much higher.
Piece of advice, it's much easier to call double bottoms in uptrends, than double tops in uptrends, and vice versa; you are barking up the wrong tree.
I use to laugh about this over and over again back in the day when I was monitoring amateur comments regarding price action.
Let me see, so everytime a higher low is made in an uptrend whenever we move to try make a higher high, we call it a potential double top?
Feel free to do as you wish, but we got "magnets" that take us much higher.
Piece of advice, it's much easier to call double bottoms in uptrends, than double tops in uptrends, and vice versa; you are barking up the wrong tree.
I always enjoy reading your insights, and I'm therefore curious to ask why you are sure the market will be making new highs in 2016 as I've seen you write a few times. Is it strictly because of TA/PA on the daily/weekly charts? And if yes, is this based on the nature of the rejections and how each keeps getting bought up? Lastly, would you just as easily change your mind if/when price hits the previous highs but there is a strong rejection or lots of sideways action without any follow through?I use to laugh about this over and over again back in the day when I was monitoring amateur comments regarding price action.
Let me see, so everytime a higher low is made in an uptrend whenever we move to try make a higher high, we call it a potential double top?
Feel free to do as you wish, but we got "magnets" that take us much higher.
Piece of advice, it's much easier to call double bottoms in uptrends, than double tops in uptrends, and vice versa; you are barking up the wrong tree.
Lastly, would you just as easily change your mind if/when price hits the previous highs but there is a strong rejection or lots of sideways action without any follow through?
I always enjoy reading your insights, and I'm therefore curious to ask why you are sure the market will be making new highs in 2016 as I've seen you write a few times. Is it strictly because of TA/PA on the daily/weekly charts? And if yes, is this based on the nature of the rejections and how each keeps getting bought up? Lastly, would you just as easily change your mind if/when price hits the previous highs but there is a strong rejection or lots of sideways action without any follow through?
Which insights? Does autodidact have a twitter feed?