GOP's Plan to Create Jobs: Do Nothing

[Mnphats]

Quote from Trader666:

Again, tell us how giving a new entitlement to 10s of millions of people in the U.S. will bring healthcare costs down.

You will never get the left to answer this question. Especially the kooks around ET.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from Mnphats:

You will never get the left to answer this question. Especially the kooks around ET.

It's a waste of this (me) kook's time. He asks questions like a budget is two line items and only two line items. It's ignorant of the process.

 

[Mnphats]

Quote from Ricter:

It's a waste of this (me) kook's time. He asks questions like a budget is two line items and only two line items. It's ignorant of the process.

Again, tell us how giving a new entitlement to 10s of millions of people in the U.S. will bring healthcare costs down?

 

[Ricter]

Quote from Hello:

I understand the money multiplying effect, we still would have been far better off subsidizing businesses through tax incentives for job creation.

If what you say is true that Australia essentially gave the money away we probably would have been better off doing that as well as it would have been a one time hit, instead we held on to every single government job out there, and in fact even created more government jobs, while the tax base is shrinking which is only going to further exacerbate the deficit problem.

That was actually what I wanted, an immediate relief to payroll withholding. Emps would have gone out with their bigger checks and bought stuff. But no, the black tie and ballgown set can't have that, the money has to funnel through their shareholdings first. And you're right about government, but there are also a couple of wars going on.

Disagree about job creation through tax relief. Would have made no difference to me, there were simply not sales enough to justify hiring (or even retention, unfortunately).

 

[Trader666]

First I caught you posing as a trader:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2788731&highlight=Ricter#post2788731

And now you're posing as an intellectual who's too busy to answer valid questions? Get a life

Again, tell us how giving a new entitlement to 10s of millions of people in the U.S. will bring healthcare costs down.

Quote from Ricter:

It's a waste of this (me) kook's time. He asks questions like a budget is two line items and only two line items. It's ignorant of the process.

 

[Mnphats]

Quote from Trader666:

First I caught you posing as a trader:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2788731&highlight=Ricter#post2788731

And now you're posing as an intellectual who's too busy to answer valid questions? Get a life

Again, tell us how giving a new entitlement to 10s of millions of people in the U.S. will bring healthcare costs down.

Parlay?

Still sports betting then? Bet not.

 

[Ricter]

Quote from Mnphats:

Again, tell us how giving a new entitlement to 10s of millions of people in the U.S. will bring healthcare costs down?

Sigh. Ceteris paribus thinking? New entitlements will not necessarily raise healthcare costs. If you can't see why "not necessarily" is true you could not be trusted to balance so much as a checkbook, much less do budgeting.

 

[Mnphats]

Quote from Ricter:

Sigh. Ceteris paribus thinking? New entitlements will not necessarily raise healthcare costs. If you can't see why "not necessarily" is true you could not be trusted to balance so much as a checkbook, much less do budgeting.

More word vomit.......


Not necessarily raise healthcare costs was not the question, I will post it again.


Again, tell us how giving a new entitlement to 10s of millions of people in the U.S. will bring healthcare costs down?

 

[Ricter]

Quote from Mnphats:

More word vomit.......

Not necessarily raise healthcare costs was not the question, I will post it again.

Again, tell us how giving a new entitlement to 10s of millions of people in the U.S. will bring healthcare costs down?

Likewise.

 

[Trader666]

And your plan to become a billionaire by winning the lottery every single week will "not necessarily" fail either.

Again, tell us how giving a new entitlement to 10s of millions of people in the U.S. will bring healthcare costs down.

Your stupidity is priceless

Quote from Ricter:

Sigh. Ceteris paribus thinking? New entitlements will not necessarily raise healthcare costs. If you can't see why "not necessarily" is true you could not be trusted to balance so much as a checkbook, much less do budgeting.