GOOG earnings after close tomorrow - need options strategy

[stock777]

If he posted that trade and then modified it after the stock tanked, I think the ops here may have to reconsider his membership. If not then the other guy is playing games, but I'm betting on the former.

 

[ForexForex]

Quote from ForexForex:

Bought 1 contract GOOG Apr 2011 550 put @ $3.80
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GOOG110416P00550000

I expect to sell tomorrow @ $10.00

Looking good, just need a little push to <= 540.00

 

[Ghost of Cutten]

Quote from SCI new york:

$8.08 earnings, 553 trading. See ya!!! longs are smoked!

So it's at 17 times earnings. Seems pretty cheap for something growing revenues at 25% pa. IMO this selloff is a good buying opportunity, GOOG will be over $1000 in the next 3 years.

 

[SCI new york]

Quote from Ghost of Cutten:

So it's at 17 times earnings. Seems pretty cheap for something growing revenues at 25% pa. IMO this selloff is a good buying opportunity, GOOG will be over $1000 in the next 3 years.

Ill take the other side of that trade.

 

[stock777]

not one reply to the accusation of fraudulent , changed, post?

a new low even for et?

 

[TheGoonior]

Quote from stock777:

not one reply to the accusation of fraudulent , changed, post?

a new low even for et?

Anybody who has been on here for a little while takes those type of posts with a grain of salt. If the poster actually took the trade as first posted and then edited it for some reason to make it look like they did something else, it's sad, but who cares? It didn't cost or make me a dime.

 

[ForexForex]

Quote from ForexForex:
Bought 1 contract GOOG Apr 2011 550 put @ $3.80
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=GOOG110416P00550000

I expect to sell tomorrow @ $10.00

Sold @ $13.00

 

[stock777]

Quote from TheGoonior:

Anybody who has been on here for a little while takes those type of posts with a grain of salt. If the poster actually took the trade as first posted and then edited it for some reason to make it look like they did something else, it's sad, but who cares? It didn't cost or make me a dime.

Actually, very few here would do something so childish. The ops here really should investigate and take action if needed. If you can't believe what you read, then wtf is the point.

The original timestamp does NOT change when edited. This is a mistake. There should be at least, an edited @ timestamp to avoid imbeciles changing posts to make themselves look good

 

[MTE]

Quote from stock777:

Did he modify his original post or was that you?

No, I didn't modify. Looks like he modified his after GOOG tanked!

 

[MTE]

Quote from stock777:

Actually, very few here would do something so childish. The ops here really should investigate and take action if needed. If you can't believe what you read, then wtf is the point.

The original timestamp does NOT change when edited. This is a mistake. There should be at least, an edited @ timestamp to avoid imbeciles changing posts to make themselves look good

Lucky for us, I quoted his post when I posted a reply so we have proof that he modified his post after he saw that the original call trade was a bad one.