You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Good news, 50,000 jobs to be added in one day.
- Thread starter noob_trad3r
- Start date
Quote from Neenisti:
I'm out to lunch and you are clueless . . . we are quite the pair.
I don't live there.
I don't live anywhere close to there.
I put it out there just as an example.
If you are prejudice against Latinos that is your problem.
Green backs are green backs.
There are listing for foreclosures in every state. If you can't use a search engine, that might be the root of your ailment.
Ah, I see that you were so worked up that you decided to edit your worthless post.
I'm not at all prejudiced against "Latinos", but I do know that the area you speak of is largely illegal immigrants. Like the rest of your infomercial pitches, you count on an ignorant reader to buy into these tales.
Ya know, there is actually a fundamental reason why many areas in this country are blighted beyond repair. Kinda has something to do with the fact that the residents are broke and this country is on a downward trajectory.
And yes there are many many foreclosures in each state, so many that you have to see the bigger picture and realize that it isn't just a tiny blip in a wave of greater prosperity. It's structural and only getting worse.
Now go back to taping your next infomercial segment, we'll all be waiting with baited breath.
Quote from denner:
Ah, I see that you were so worked up that you decided to edit your worthless post.
I'm not at all prejudiced against "Latinos", but I do know that the area you speak of is largely illegal immigrants. Like the rest of your infomercial pitches, you count on an ignorant reader to buy into these tales.
Ya know, there is actually a fundamental reason why many areas in this country are blighted beyond repair. Kinda has something to do with the fact that the residents are broke and this country is on a downward trajectory.
And yes there are many many foreclosures in each state, so many that you have to see the bigger picture and realize that it isn't just a tiny blip in a wave of greater prosperity. It's structural and only getting worse.
Now go back to taping your next infomercial segment, we'll all be waiting with baited breath.
I'm a trader not a real estate developer. Before I was a trader I worked in corporate America. I hate infomercials. If you bothered to read my posts I clearly stated I hate rehabs. The work I put into my own property each year is plenty of work for me. I enjoy my free time too much and like to travel. Doing rehabs takes too much time. The one property I did in Michigan I dumped as quick as I could so I didn't have to think about it anymore.
I agree with you that a lot of areas aren't worth the effort but others are. You, like most people aren't willing to take the time to separate out those areas. If the "money" doesn't come easy, you aren't interested. Hey, I don't blame you for wanting the easy route to wealth but there are others that will have to actually "work hard" for their piece of the pie. It's too easy to just say, "it can't work" because it makes you feel better about not doing the work. I don't begrudge others for the effort they put out and would never tell them, "it is impossible" because that is a lie, it isn't.
Quote from Neenisti:
I'm a trader not a real estate developer. Before I was a trader I worked in corporate America. I hate infomercials. If you bothered to read my posts I clearly stated I hate rehabs. The work I put into my own property each year is plenty of work for me. I enjoy my free time too much and like to travel. Doing rehabs takes too much time. The one property I did in Michigan I dumped as quick as I could so I didn't have to think about it anymore.
I agree with you that a lot of areas aren't worth the effort but others are. You, like most people aren't willing to take the time to separate out those areas. If the "money" doesn't come easy, you aren't interested. Hey, I don't blame you for wanting the easy route to wealth but there are others that will have to actually "work hard" for their piece of the pie. It's too easy to just say, "it can't work" because it makes you feel better about not doing the work. I don't begrudge others for the effort they put out and would never tell them, "it is impossible" because that is a lie, it isn't.
I work very hard at what I do (I only trade here and there nowadays after starting with it 15 years ago). Instead, I'm a small biz owner so I do have a good pulse on the economy at large. I just don't like the sort of surface level anecdote's about other's achievements, without any real insight into the amount of effort or risks involved. It usually gives the wrong impression since details are few and far between.
As far as real estate speculation goes, it's a minefield now more than ever for a littany of reasons, not withstanding that unemployment problems, it's deeper than that obviously.
Quote from Neenisti:
Yup, live in the city and get hosed. It's no wonder you can't fathom someone making a living managing a restaurant and rehabbing homes.
My neighbor just built an insulated/heated/cooled all steel 3 car garage on a slab with a workshop and bathroom for $19K.
Something is wrong here. I think you are missing the labour cost.
House 1 - Norwegian - green - Pall Mall - Coffee - Birds
House 2 - German - Blue - Prince - Water - Fish
House 3 - Brit - Red - Blend - Milk - Horses
House 4 - Dane - Yellow - Dunhill - Tea - Cats
House 5 - Swede - White - Blue Mast - Beer - Dogs
This meets all criterion, but doesn't prove the solution is unique. Therefore at LEAST one solution is that the fish lives in house 2 w/ the German. Proving the solution is unique is a whole other problem. A counter example showing another complete solution would do the job...
But what kind of Doosh would post an ambiguous puzzle in a message board?
House 2 - German - Blue - Prince - Water - Fish
House 3 - Brit - Red - Blend - Milk - Horses
House 4 - Dane - Yellow - Dunhill - Tea - Cats
House 5 - Swede - White - Blue Mast - Beer - Dogs
This meets all criterion, but doesn't prove the solution is unique. Therefore at LEAST one solution is that the fish lives in house 2 w/ the German. Proving the solution is unique is a whole other problem. A counter example showing another complete solution would do the job...
But what kind of Doosh would post an ambiguous puzzle in a message board?
I'll answer it since the person it was directed to, can't.
The German in the 4th house isn't shown as having any pet so everyone automatically assumes since the questions is, "who has the fish", that the German has the fish. The German could have an elephant, who knows.
The correct answer is,
The German has no designated pet and no one definitively has a fish.
Dammit
Quote from brokershopping:
Dammit
Definitely obnoxious. The question implies that someone has a fish, and these things are not always worded unambigously. All I know is if I wanted sushi I would try the German's house first.
BTW - it is unique. To prove set up the grid with all possibilities in each cell, iterate through the rules (it takes more than once) and strike out what is eliminated.