Good Methods

Originally posted by Brandonf


Not likely, though you can find systems that hit 60 to 70% and have a 1 to 1 expectancy. If you are looking for something that offers 3 units of reward to 1 of risk you will likely be looking at something that hits at 50% or less. Good luck.

Brandon
More...

thanks Brandonf and wareagle.

i must lower my expectations.
 
Originally posted by CuteGirl


no sir. I want to date him. He sent me a photo and I have fallen in love.

I shall attach it for you. He has the looks and the money!!!
More...

Isn't that the 21st terrorist they're looking for?? :confused:

hahahhahahahahaa:D
 
Looking at the picture it looks like he's stepping on the back of what once was a car with a BOMB in it. Standing proudly over the destruction he caused to that poor garage.
 
Originally posted by ANCHOR


That's a man who knows how to trade.
More...


Thanks for the complement Anchor, but I'm nobody special...just a guy trying to live the dream like everyone else here. I've just taken a few bumps along the way that might have been saved if someone had told me this stuff when I started out.


And Brandon is right...in all my system testing I've found an indirect correlation between [win %] and [avg win/avg loss]. Now someone may have found a method with the best of both worlds, but I haven't. Oh, and if I do, you better believe I won't sell it or write a book about it. :eek:
 
Thug_life, I bet you can relate to super greg's 'Gangsta Years'. :D (Thug, if your under 13 or your name isn't in reference to Tupac please ignore my nastiness):)
 
Originally posted by WarEagle


More is not necessarily better. There simply aren't any secrets, and to expect anyone to give you something that doesn't exist will keep your head spinning forever.
More...

So true!!!!! I wish that had occured to me sooner!

Gee I missed this place today!
:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top