In poker odds is easy to calculate. I am 100% believe in the math and bet only when odds or expected return are in my favor,thats in a low limit game of course. where in trading,although I know almost every formation in books,but I am not certain with the percentage behind it and I see setup everywhere.For the same reason an elite tennis player is not elite at golf. They are both different games lol. The tennis player has spent a lifetime of dedicated practice in their sport and not the other.
You clearly know how to player poker and have dedicated time on it. You have a verified method - probably some form of solid ABC poker (strong starting hands, good table position, C-Bet most flops etc) - and your positive PnL is direct feedback on this.
Trading is an entirely different beast (yeah it’s about probability, expectation yada yada...). Most people dabble with totally unverified methods. They cannot distinguish the difference between market behaviour and randomness and the market preys on this cognitive defect. Your negative PnL is direct feedback that most likely implies that you don’t have a verifiable method.
It is no coincidence you have rock solid “discipline” in poker yet tilt in markets.. and this is NOT down to psychology, mentality, performance states etc etc.. yawn
The common denominator is skill. You have skill in poker, and not trading. Before committing more money in trading (and going down the trading psychology route) prove that you have skill in it first.
