Quote from arealpissedgoy:
GS is up 60% because everything being done by Paulson is done for the benefit of GS.
Ban on short sales:
When GS dropped nearly 10% in one day
Bailout Package:
When GS tested $100
Outright Purchase of Bank stock:
When GS broke below $100
The moral of the paulson dramas?
better not mess with his 300 million stocks and options in GS.
Why was LEH allowed to go bankrupt while BSC was allowed to be bought up?
Paulson has personal animosity against Fuld.
I'm pretty sure Paulson was forced to sell his GS shares when he took his current post. Lehman and BSC were both badly managed and were hemorraging money, they deserved to fail. Bear got bought for a fraction of it's worth and most of it's employees got fired. Lehman went bankrupt but Barclays is buying pieces of it and keeping people on, so in the end I think they both got pretty similar deals other than the stock going to zero.
I don't know if Paulson is corrupt or not, but I don't think he has any financial interest in GS doing well.
