Quote from ByLoSellHi:
This is actually probably true, and the reason why GS met and beat earnings.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
GS was able to beat "depressed" earnings expectations via equity offerings ( re: Citi ) and a much lower tax rate for the quarter ( 27 vs 34% ), not too mention increased asset management fees.
GS also benefited from a $725 million dollar appreciation in its own investments, including $214 million from Industrial and Commercial Bank of China.
They made $616 million in equity underwriting, and another $985 million from the firm's Prime Brokerage department.
Their trading revenues did not show the kind of gains that you imply. Net revenues in its trading and principal investments business fell 16% from a year ago.
