Uptick = Obviously, to add a damper to market selloff.Look at it this way.
Spoofing must cause some damage to the market participation, in some complex way. If it did not, why would they have a rule not allowing it? Like on the SEC side...What it is with the "uptick" rule? I do not know the ins and out of that one, but there must be a REASON for it on short-selling?
Spoofing is not anything new. It's been around for ever. People were spoofing long before they introduced the regulation. During the heyday of dot com era, they were spoofing like crazy. And yet nobody complained. All of a sudden, regulators believe this is damaging to our collective market psyche? Please.
Consider the Flash Crash. They couldn't come up with anything plausible, so they went after an Indian dude living in UK under the pretense of spoofing. Personally, I don't buy it. There are too many loose threads.