Gold will always underperform the S&P500

You gold detractors miss the point. Robust stores of wealth have always required rarity. That is why a virtuous woman is worth any price. We are now in the era of Peak Gold. Increasingly, as in antiquity, gold intended as a store of wealth is being fashioned into works of art, as in the case of the Pamp Suisse gold bar or the Buffalo coin or the Gold Philharmonic. I have always bought gold for beauty, never imagining when gold was in the high-$200's that it would break $1000 in my lifetime. Gold is art. And art is timeless value. Also it will buy more virtuous women now than it did earlier at one-quarter the current price.
 
Quote from makloda:

Paulson is a trader, most gold bulls are not. A trader knows when to get out of a position should it start going against him before he enters it. How many of the naive retail gold bulls can claim that of themselves?

The gold bulls love taking Paulson's name into their mouth because it seemingly gives their cause so much more professional credibility, yet they have so little in common with him.

Again a presumption toward the gold bulls that can easily be said about 'retail investors' in any asset class.

Global losses worldwide both on an institutional level as on a retail level have been mind boggling this crisis so I see no reason to frown upon goldbulls for their supposed passive attitude in comparison with others.

As far as the naive retail gold bulls goes I'll have you know they have been big sellers these last months in my country taking advantage of the high prices outnumbering buyers substantially according to all data.

Time will tell if they did the right thing.



As far as the Paulson reference goes obviously he is a logical target because of his extremely succesfull track record as of late but one could easily point out the bullishness on gold of other big names such as George Soros or Paul Tudor Jones, just pick any name out there .

That's just the timeframe we are living in.

All the fat cats are bullish on gold, and if they are not they won't admit it in public cause why would you admit you have been missing out on such an easy trade?

Like Hugh Hendry talking about gold when it was at 900$ and he expected it to go to 700$ at which point he would consider buying it.

These lousy calls kill reputations, you know that makloda.
 
Quote from KINGOFSHORTS:

Gold has a negative carrying cost as well.

Worse is the tax treatment.

In the US all forms of Gold, excluding US Mint gold coins, are taxed as a collectible, which is fixed at 28% for all holdings in excess of one year.

Holding for less than one year are taxed at your ordinary income rate.

Those rates also apply to GLD shares, since it's a bullion-backed ETF.
 
Quote from makloda:

Paulson is a trader, most gold bulls are not. A trader knows when to get out of a position should it start going against him before he enters it. .

Is this the same John Paulson who held onto his entire CDS positions when the ABX rallied 50% in his face in spring 2007? So much for deferring to price action.

Retail investors buy into all kinds of assets. One could make exactly the same argument about bonds, real estate, stocks etc. When there's a bear market, retailers will get hosed, as they always do. What's your point?
 
Oh goodness another one of these silly threads. Who bought S&P back then and held it? What were the costs of doing that? This is a contrived example. If you accumulated gold since then at various price points, then how'd you do?

Again, this is silliness. I love the gold bashing though, it's amusing.
 
Quote from PlusMinus:

Oh goodness another one of these silly threads. Who bought S&P back then and held it? What were the costs of doing that? This is a contrived example. If you accumulated gold since then at various price points, then how'd you do?

Again, this is silliness. I love the gold bashing though, it's amusing.

Yeah exactly. The only legit comparison is to look at a basket of investments and see its performance over each 5-20 year time horizon over the last 50-100 years. If one with say 5-10% of gold showed a greater risk-adjusted return than one without, then gold is a legitimate investment for any portfolio investors. If gold has some hedging properties against financial crises, capital controls, wars or other disasters, then it has insurance value. That is all.

People wanking on about what joe dentist and a bunch of gogo momentum funds are doing in December 2009 has nothing whatsoever to do with the investment case for gold or any other asset.
 
Quote from Ghost of Cutten:

Is this the same John Paulson who held onto his entire CDS positions when the ABX rallied 50% in his face in spring 2007? So much for deferring to price action.
Just like being long a put option, a CDS contract has a built in stop loss. The maximum loss is defined by the premium paid.

Your argument is obviously completely misplaced.
 
Quote from KINGOFSHORTS:

If you invested a 10K in the S&P in 1985 it would be worth 60383.4974

10K in gold at 300Oz would be worth 40,666

And I am not even including the dividends payed out by SPY which with compounding would make the total return higher than 60383.4974


Gold has a negative carrying cost as well.

Buying gold today is like buying gold in FEB of 1980.

A Goldbug loading up in gold in Feb of 1980 (10K dollars)

10K in 1980 = 12.5 ounces (800 an ounce)
10K in 1980 in S&P500 basket = 86.92 units

10K today at spot 1220 = 15250 dollars
10K today at S&P 1105.98 = 96,131.78

and this is not including dividends or reinvestment of dividends.

Infact the best time to buy into the S&P 500 is when
the markets sell off and no one is interested in stocks and when gold hits peaks.

High gold prices low S&P = buy S&P

There is no economic sense to hold gold with its wide bid/ask prices, low liquidity and opaque price discovery(all based on hype and manipulation)

S&P500 represents an investment in a basket of fractional ownership in productive assets.

Longterm bearish gold
Longterm bullish S&P

I just want to clarify things because I am getting lots of calls about putting entire IRAs into gold etc.. from folks hearing too much on the TV/Radio about gold.

10yearreturnsbyassetcla.png
 
Quote from jprad:

Worse is the tax treatment.

In the US all forms of Gold, excluding US Mint gold coins, are taxed as a collectible, which is fixed at 28% for all holdings in excess of one year.

Holding for less than one year are taxed at your ordinary income rate.

Those rates also apply to GLD shares, since it's a bullion-backed ETF.

It's strange but in my country (which is top 5 tax pressure worldwide) gold is free from any taxes when buying nor do we have capital gain taxes on gold or stocks of any kind.

I guess you can't have it both ways.
 
Back
Top