Since I blew up my account this last month or so, I've been reading up on how to use stop losses more effectively. I came across this article which I found insightful:
https://www.quant-investing.com/blo...bout-stop-losses-that-nobody-wants-to-believe
Of particular interest was Research study 3 - Taming Momentum Crashes: A Simple Stop-loss Strategy. Cliff notes & link to study below:
http://www.cicfconf.org/sites/default/files/paper_811.pdf
The researchers applied a simple momentum strategy of each month buying the 10% of companies with the largest price increase the past six months and selling short the 10% of companies with the largest price decline the past six months.
Once the stop-loss was triggered on any day the company was either sold (Winners) or bought (Losers) to close the position.Remember this was a long-short portfolio.
The proceeds were invested in the risk-free asset (T-bills) until the end of the month.
So I liked that the strategy reduced the risk associated with crashes, but something that still bothers me is that it relied on staying both long & short for long periods of time. I recall a story last year of a guy that went short on a company that was diving, only to get burned when it gapped up due to an acquisition. A short stop loss in this case won't help since it's a market order.
Perhaps the above strategy is not much different than hedging w/options, but it struck me as a bit simpler. Any input on how to address my concern when using the above?
https://www.quant-investing.com/blo...bout-stop-losses-that-nobody-wants-to-believe
Of particular interest was Research study 3 - Taming Momentum Crashes: A Simple Stop-loss Strategy. Cliff notes & link to study below:
http://www.cicfconf.org/sites/default/files/paper_811.pdf
The researchers applied a simple momentum strategy of each month buying the 10% of companies with the largest price increase the past six months and selling short the 10% of companies with the largest price decline the past six months.
Once the stop-loss was triggered on any day the company was either sold (Winners) or bought (Losers) to close the position.Remember this was a long-short portfolio.
The proceeds were invested in the risk-free asset (T-bills) until the end of the month.
So I liked that the strategy reduced the risk associated with crashes, but something that still bothers me is that it relied on staying both long & short for long periods of time. I recall a story last year of a guy that went short on a company that was diving, only to get burned when it gapped up due to an acquisition. A short stop loss in this case won't help since it's a market order.
Perhaps the above strategy is not much different than hedging w/options, but it struck me as a bit simpler. Any input on how to address my concern when using the above?
)