Miller's experiment. By default. It showed that more junk was made then anything helpful.if you study science, electricity, physics etc, you read then experiment to prove.
What experiments has proven God?
Miller's experiment. By default. It showed that more junk was made then anything helpful.if you study science, electricity, physics etc, you read then experiment to prove.
What experiments has proven God?
That's not what I was on about and you know it, you are deflecting as always.That has no bearing on whether or not Jesus can save someone by His substitutionary death and resurrection. He was crucified.
And how does that relate to proving you are saved through Jesus and have a current walking talking relationship with the present living Jesus?Miller's experiment. By default. It showed that more junk was made then anything helpful.
http://www.kingjamesbibledictionary.com/StrongsNo/G4716/CrossThat's not what I was on about and you know it, you are deflecting as always.
The bible and Christianity tout on endlessly about the cross.
The original meaning was not a cross he was nailed to.
Since when ever was a pole a cross?a pole or cross
Jesus was needed to create life.And how does that relate to proving you are saved through Jesus and have a current walking talking relationship with the present living Jesus?
Pole is the definition of the word that was translated into cross in English. That's how you use Strongs. I'd have to do some more research on this to find out if criminals were never crucified with arms outstretched, but at least we both now know that the original greek word means pole, so if it wasn't a cross, but a pole, then the error is simply in the translation to English and has nothing to do with the authenticity of the original Scriptures.Since when ever was a pole a cross?
But you've only read about it, what experiments to prove?Jesus was needed to create life.
Because He is my creator, and because I've been reconciled to Him, I have a walking talking relationship with the present living Jesus.