Exactly! Please read the report if you want to prove to us you are not just trolling.* There are 100's of other examples of collusion with the campaign, but not necessarily with Trump himself -- though it defies credulity to think that Trump was unaware of the activities of those working to elect him. Collusion is not a crime. Mueller's objection to Barr's characterization was that he, Mueller, had not shown that there was "no collusion." But this is how Barr had publicly characterized the report. Mueller called Barr to discuss this and register his objections to Barr's characterization. Collusion is not a crime and there is no specific bar to be met to conclude there was collusion. "Conspiracy," on the other hand is the charge on which Mueller felt they could not meet the high bar he himself imposed.
I am not going to put you on ignore, but neither am I going to respond further to your posts on this topic because you haven't indicated any interest in careful reading of the Mueller report, and also because you too often use ad hominem responses to qualify as someone I want to communicate with.
_______________
*Your instantaneous response to posts suggests to me that you may have not read the post you are responding too with much care.
Last edited:
