I absolutely do not know your account size. I tried to frame the comment in such a way as to make it clear that I was extrapolating from your statements. You saidQuote from Neet:
I trade the YM, I think 1 car for every 2.5-3.5k in your account is not overleverage. What made you think you knew my total equity
"I had to cover for 30. 30 is a little high for me"
So either 30 is a little high for you or 1 car for every 2.5-3.5k in your account is in line with your account size, in this position. I was not attacking you, just making a point regarding optimal position sizing vis-a-vis the method you are describing. Did you not read the sentence where I said 'You seem to have a good concept of risk management'? If 30 cars x (2.5 - 3.5k/car) is 'a little high for you' in the sense that the product is nearing your total equity, there is the additional consideration of high correlation, but I don't think daytraders think in this way, and I assume you are a pure daytrader.
I do indeed want to be realistic. That's why I mentioned specific markets. I strongly disagree with the idea that your stops make your unrealized P & L 'pretty much secured' in any market. The indices are your best market if you are trading with this assumption. You are trading the indices. One thing that is clear is that you have never been in a futures market that makes a limit move or in an equity that is halted and opens at some ridiculous number.Quote from Neet:
However, technically, you are absolutely correct, they are unrealized profits but pretty much secured by the stops if you want to be realistic.
It was neither a help nor a hindrance. You seem a bit defensive about this. My post was an attempt to say that I think it's great that you are trying to trade this way, and that as long as you have certain parameters (correct market, position size and tight discipline) under control, you should be okay.Quote from Neet:
Hope it helps.
