So ridiculous. When institutions, hedge funds, HFT, billionaires manipulate the market it's OK, but when you don't play by the same rules of cheating you get sued? All market manipulation is bad, but everyone should get slapped equally.
Unfortunately, that has never been the case. It's been a case by case issue for the longest time. The bigger the names the more the regulators need to save face for all the fees they garner from all the participants.So ridiculous. When institutions, hedge funds, HFT, billionaires manipulate the market it's OK, but when you don't play by the same rules of cheating you get sued? All market manipulation is bad, but everyone should get slapped equally.
"The plaintiff allegedly was injured by this “pump and dump,” purchasing 10 shares on May 13, 2024 (shortly after the May 12th tweet), and additional shares on June 4, 7 and 11 (a total of 25 shares). The plaintiff also purchased three options, two on May 13, 2024 (one sold on May 17) and one more on June 3, 2024."
Somebody help me understand this.On June 3, The Wall Street Journal reported that Gill had bought a large volume of GameStop options just before his May 12 post. This news led to a 5.36% drop in GameStop’s stock price, according to the filing.
But is that really all there is? Or is that all he wants you to see or believe? How do you know for sure that he didn't sell at the top? Moreover, how do you know he doesn't have another brokerage account he uses to cover his tracks?It’s not manipulation if he just states his position.
How come Tokyo Joe got in trouble?But is that really all there is? Or is that all he wants you to see or believe? How do you know for sure that he didn't sell at the top? Moreover, how do you know he doesn't have another brokerage account he uses to cover his tracks?
It's mostly "same shit, different story" (and definitely different times). Tokyo Mex didn't carry the same horde of brainwashed zealots like Roaring Kitty. RK's followers can't see, and don't care to see, what their hero is doing.How come Tokyo Joe got in trouble?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPcap/2000-01/06/070r-010600-idx.html
But is that really all there is? Or is that all he wants you to see or believe? How do you know for sure that he didn't sell at the top? Moreover, how do you know he doesn't have another brokerage account he uses to cover his tracks?
Why would shorting be illegal, either in this account or that account? No dude, what's illegal is him initially pumping up GME and then subsequently selling all his positions in his secondary account but only showing his position in his primary account. Thereby giving false impression that he's still in the trade.what. He’s shorting hundreds of millions of gme in another account? If that were true that would be illegal.
it’s not manipulation if he sells at the top. Gme is not a penny stock.