E*Trade Considers Kicking Meme-Stock Leader Keith Gill Off Platform
https://www.wsj.com/finance/regulat...h-gill-off-platform-f2003ec4?mod=hp_lead_pos1
https://www.wsj.com/finance/regulat...h-gill-off-platform-f2003ec4?mod=hp_lead_pos1
E*Trade Considers Kicking Meme-Stock Leader Keith Gill Off Platform
https://www.wsj.com/finance/regulat...h-gill-off-platform-f2003ec4?mod=hp_lead_pos1

I closed pre-market @ 43.40...we'll see how much I left on the table as this could go to the .618 fib ($47.21) but I'm not waiting around to see.![]()
Etrade (his broker) is requiring 100percent for stock.
how did he make 200mm when he was worth 50mm when the stock was at 600?
How is this any different than if a hedge fund says they have a position? You're legally required to state when you have a position over 5% of the stock. However, if he states his position it's market manipulation? The real unethical market manipulation comes from Citadel and Virtu which have taken all price discovery out of the market by knowing what orders are coming in and from who before anybody else. They have access to the supply and demand dynamics that no traders have. They know what's institutional flow and retail flow. It's insider trading on a mass scale that nobody has ever had before. I would not be surprised if they bribed the completely corrupt SEC to keep PFOF and they told ETrade to take down Gil's account.i was ok with underdogs but today his action today is obviously manipulating.
i bought the dip last tuesday and exited last friday with 4% gain, which i was happy with, deciding not to carry the positions over the weekend.
How is this any different than if a hedge fund says they have a position? You're legally required to state when you have a position over 5% of the stock. However, if he states his position it's market manipulation? The real unethical market manipulation comes from Citadel and Virtu which have taken all price discovery out of the market by knowing what orders are coming in and from who before anybody else. They have access to the supply and demand dynamics that no traders have. They know what's institutional flow and retail flow. It's insider trading on a mass scale that nobody has ever had before. I would not be surprised if they bribed the completely corrupt SEC to keep PFOF and they told ETrade to take down Gil's account.
How is this any different than if a hedge fund says they have a position? You're legally required to state when you have a position over 5% of the stock. However, if he states his position it's market manipulation? The real unethical market manipulation comes from Citadel and Virtu which have taken all price discovery out of the market by knowing what orders are coming in and from who before anybody else. They have access to the supply and demand dynamics that no traders have. They know what's institutional flow and retail flow. It's insider trading on a mass scale that nobody has ever had before. I would not be surprised if they bribed the completely corrupt SEC to keep PFOF and they told ETrade to take down Gil's account.
How is this any different than if a hedge fund says they have a position? You're legally required to state when you have a position over 5% of the stock. However, if he states his position it's market manipulation? The real unethical market manipulation comes from Citadel and Virtu which have taken all price discovery out of the market by knowing what orders are coming in and from who before anybody else. They have access to the supply and demand dynamics that no traders have. They know what's institutional flow and retail flow. It's insider trading on a mass scale that nobody has ever had before. I would not be surprised if they bribed the completely corrupt SEC to keep PFOF and they told ETrade to take down Gil's account.
How is this any different than if a hedge fund says they have a position? You're legally required to state when you have a position over 5% of the stock. However, if he states his position it's market manipulation?