GM - how long before bankruptcy?

Quote from Alchemist:

***Well at first they will get it from gasoline converted to hydrogen under the hood. Still using about half of it as it normally would. ***

Now that is a really poor idea, having a mini gasoline cracking plant under the hood. In addition to the hydrogen manufactured, there would be copious amounts of carbon dioxide (greenhouse gases) produced and even worse, lots of cracking byproducts that will have to be stored in a tank in the auto and/or eliminated from entering the atmosphere. So every time we fill up the tank with gas we unfill our reformer tank?

And it won't use half the gasoline unless the Laws of Thermodynamics are repealed. Who came up with that, an Exxon marketing exec?

Otto, diesel, and internal combustion engines produce mechanical power directly, and not via a fuel cell’s electric motor, which is more inefficient. They can be powered by alternative fuels such as biodiesel, but that is a topic of another discussion.

Internal combustion engines have a long history of engineering work: given the right design, they can process fuels very efficiently. Converting one form of energy (gasoline) into another (hydrogen) and then using a fuel cell to convert that to yet another form (electricity) and then to yet another form (mechanical energy) wastes energy and will never happen on a large scale.

***Eventually they will get it from other liquids like water, using electricity from hopefully from renewable sources like solar, wind etc. and it will be available at your local gas station***

Basic molecules like water dislike very much being broke apart into component elements. They dislike it so much that nature charges a very large energy fee to do so.

So instead of paying that fee, why not just use the electricity directly in electric/battery powered cards, instead of: producing electricity, from which hydrogen is very inefficiently produced, so that it can be shipping and stored, then pumped into a car, where it is converted back to electricity to run a motor.

It seems very unlikely that this will ever be done on a large scale, when an electric car can be directly plugged into the grid instead, in the comfort of your own home.

There are other sources of hydrogen you didn't mention like via coal gasification or garbage dump/methane production. These sources, like the others, are just a series of inefficient uses of the energy. They also produce CO2 as a byproduct.

Autos can be run very efficiently, for example, on the natural gas that coal gasification produces directly. Right now Honda is experimenting with NG powered Civics that can be filled up from home --- again, eliminating that pesky hydrogen filling station and storage and transfer infrastructure.

So it turns out that because hydrogen is not readily available on the earth in its elemental form, it is really only an energy STORAGE medium, and a rather inefficient one at that.

In my opinion Fuel Cells will never be deployed on a large scale, and GM, unfortunately, is riding the wrong horse.

very good explanation. imho hybrids are the next evolution until a commercially viable fully electric car can be produced.
 
Quote from Alchemist:

***


There's a lot of fuel cell companies that would like to disagree with you. Either way I would love to see oil become absolete some day.
 
Quote from brokerboy:

The conversation is dumb. Why are fuel cells not viable? You telling me we can put people on the moon but we can’t figure out good alternatives please. I am sure they can make cars run on piss if they wanted. Oil companies have engine patents they bought over the last 50 years. Some of the engines run over 100 miles a gallon. It’s all based on capitalism. What would Exxon sell if we no longer needed gas? Do you think Exxon and the other oil companies contribute to government campaigns for good reasons? Why do you think they contribute or why does any big corporation contribute? The system is based on bullshit. Now if I was a car company I would make gas companies some how complicate me for building gas cars. Fuck think about it that’s why Bill Gates is the riches man in the world. He said you build the computers because without me they can’t run it.


I am sure the technology is out there that cars could run on alt fuels (maybe piss I don't know). I think you have some of that right, it is all based on capitalism, exactly, now think who loses out if alt fuel really kicks into the mainstream and oil/gas consumption is cut in 1/2 or 1/4 or worse!! We are not talking about some people losing millions, the Saudis are Trillionaires alone!! That buys more clout, influence and sheer power than anyone on this forum can fathom. Not to mention you have an Oil family running the show at the White House. Even if we had an imaginable third party at the helm there still wouldn't be enough power to stop that greed machine. Greed begets greed and oil fat cats are used to making billions a year, they will do everything in their scope to see that continues. My feelings are that the oil elite will (or are currently) be buying alt fuel companies for future investments/dynasties.

As far as GM's future, I like most think it's dismal at best. They are on a one way path to suicide. The only commercials I am seeing these days are the new Suburban they are so proud of. I can't believe they are actually trying to market it mpg, it's an 8 cyl SUV for Christs sake! So it gets 17 mpg instead last years 16 mpg model, who cares! The marketing dept at GM is punch drunk from the competition and this proves it. What are they thinking? LMAO!! Why on earth would they be spending advertising dollars on a dying Full size SUV market?? Not to mention record gas prices = shit scared buying public. These guys are always behind the curve, Toyota has stated numerous times that their hybrids are beating sales expectations for a couple years now...Hello GM? (knock,knock) Anybody home? Guess what hybrids are not a passing fad.
If GM would be proactive instead of reactive (I don't even know if you can call it reactive, more like ignoring) they might have a shot. I think their corporate culture/ideology is just terrible and they have no one to blame but themselves for their problems. All that being said, GM will probably never go bankrupt as the American taxpayer will be left holding the bag, sad, very sad. :(

Also, with regards to quality, I live outside of the USA and the people here will not touch American cars because the quality just isn't there, here Jap cars rule the roads. Sorry for writing a book.
 
Quote from lilboy716:

hahaha...

another one bought into it.


buy hondas... you won't regret it. my 9year old 150k miles. just had axles replaced for 140bucks. 40-44mpg on freeway (60mph).


i go in for repair about twice, maybe 3 times a year. things are replaced before they break, and the parts are cheap. nothing major had happened. starts up every time. tranny has been makning noise since i got it... that was 65k ago

When I see someone boasting of 40 MPG from a little coffee grinder car it makes me wonder. I have a 2000 Bonneville with 130,000 miles and I get 34 MPG on long trips with 5 large people inside. My car has never seen a dealer or mechanic besides a recall. You sure are sacrificing a lot for that 6 MPG. You would think that if a full size sedan can get 34 MPG that a little car half the size should get 70 MPG but it's not like that.
 
Quote from traderNik:





again... it is old news that automobiles manufactured by the big 3 American automakers cannot compete in terms of quality, reliability, or price with foreign made cars. This is not speculation; it is the conclusion of US analysts.

I agree....They must reinvent themselves or they will go the way of the dinosaur....

Consumers today are far more educated then past generations...the " I buy american" mentality is dead. Today it's I buy quality. No more will us auto makers milk me with a barrage of never ending auto part replacements.

although I do like the caddy CTS.... .... :D

Nick
 
Quote from NKNY:

I agree....They must reinvent themselves or they will go the way of the dinosaur....

Consumers today are far more educated then past generations...the " I buy american" mentality is dead. Today it's I buy quality. No more will us auto makers milk me with a barrage of never ending auto part replacements.

although I do like the caddy CTS.... .... :D

Nick

You are perfectly right: automakers derive much of their profits from sellling part replacement.

I had an Alfa Romeo buisness back in the late '80s and the sale of auto parts kept me in buisness.

Altought not for long.
 
34mpg on long trips

i probably can top 44 on long trips. my 40-44mpg is on 25mile communte to santa monica through downtown LA every day.


yours is a 2000. it's barely used. i bot my car used when it was like your car's age. you have a pontiac... hehe.... good luck...




Quote from MRWSM:

When I see someone boasting of 40 MPG from a little coffee grinder car it makes me wonder. I have a 2000 Bonneville with 130,000 miles and I get 34 MPG on long trips with 5 large people inside. My car has never seen a dealer or mechanic besides a recall. You sure are sacrificing a lot for that 6 MPG. You would think that if a full size sedan can get 34 MPG that a little car half the size should get 70 MPG but it's not like that.
 
Quote from lilboy716:

34mpg on long trips

i probably can top 44 on long trips. my 40-44mpg is on 25mile communte to santa monica through downtown LA every day.


yours is a 2000. it's barely used. i bot my car used when it was like your car's age. you have a pontiac... hehe.... good luck...


They have not improved small cars much. When I was young I had a 1979 Plymouth Champ that got 50 MPG highway, you would think after a quarter century they could have doubled that to 100 MPG. Oh well. 44 MPG does not impress me. BTW My last 2 cars were also Pontiac and I got 300,000 miles out of each. The last one was a Firebird with over 300,000 miles and all original except the onboard computer and a fuel pump, everything else was original and perfect including the engine and transmission. I sold it in good condition, in fact I sold it in one week at cars.com and I had people fighting over it. In contrast, I briefly had a BMW 740iL that gave me nothing but problems, I learned a lot about BMW, more than I wanted to know.
 
Quote from MRWSM:

So apparently you are one of the idiots

yes, it is true, I am an idiot

who are so easily convinced by these initial quality comparisons, but when presented by some facts from a commercial suddenly you don't believe.

When presented with the facts from... a commercial??? Is this a misprint?

My goodness - there may be hope for the big 3 US automakers yet!!

Well the motor recently has been squeeking up a storm

damn squeeking...

shove it up your ass.

ok, well put - a cogent argument.

I briefly had a BMW 740iL that gave me nothing but problems, I learned a lot about BMW, more than I wanted to know.

Yes, those damn BMWs... famous for being badly engineered, those cars. Especially those M class BMWs. Nothing but trouble. My M3 is just a piece of crap. I was hoping to be in an M5 in a few years, but now I'll have to rethink. That is just a P.O.S sedan if there ever was one. Your Bonneville sedan kicks that M5 all around the room.

I know a lot of guys who went from a 740iL to a Bonneville, actually. Just like you did. That's a common move among disgruntled BMW owners. A lot of the guys I've talked to have told me 'Yeah, the 740iL is just a piece of junk compared to my Bonneville'.
 
Quote from traderNik:

yes, it is true, I am an idiot



When presented with the facts from... a commercial??? Is this a misprint?

My goodness - there may be hope for the big 3 US automakers yet!!



damn squeeking...



ok, well put - a cogent argument.



Yes, those damn BMWs... famous for being badly engineered, those cars. Especially those M class BMWs. Nothing but trouble. My M3 is just a piece of crap. I was hoping to be in an M5 in a few years, but now I'll have to rethink. That is just a P.O.S sedan if there ever was one. Your Bonneville sedan kicks that M5 all around the room.

I know a lot of guys who went from a 740iL to a Bonneville, actually. Just like you did. That's a common move among disgruntled BMW owners. A lot of the guys I've talked to have told me 'Yeah, the 740iL is just a piece of junk compared to my Bonneville'.

Yes, I am one of those disgruntled BMW owners......just picked up a 525 six months ago.... now looking for a bonneville.... I prefer a 2000 bonneville since the 2005, 3.8L V6 with 205HP only gets 20/29 mpg

BMW......what was I thinking




And can't forget about those old 1979 Plymouths .... 50 MPG ...wonder if it was hwy milage...?

Ahhh the good ol days....

Nick
 
Back
Top