Global Warming: The coldest Spring in 50 years.

"The scientific opinion on climate change is that the Earth's climate system is unequivocally warming, and it is more than 90% certain that humans are causing most of it through activities that increase concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, such as deforestation and burning fossil fuels. "

jem says, "for ignorant fools like FC... let me make it clear... activities such as... deforestation (they left out cows, methane production, planting certain crops, perhaps even congregating in groups ) and burning of fossil fuels.... is not the same as saying man made co2 is cause the warming. "

You're wrong.

If A then B.
If B then C.
Therefore, if A then C.
 
Quote from jem:

I felt this needed to be reposted....

no warming statistically discernable outside natural variation.

For you traders that means science can't tell if we are in a move up a move down our its just noise because nothing about this temperature drift is unusual or unexpected.

So in short this is just some guru trying to sell you an S&P futures systems which was just recently curve fit by the IPCC 4 different times.

They sold a system based on data mining or curve fitting the past data.

But when you took it live it failed every time.

Why? because we are not in a temperature trend.


You are a lying evil piece of shit. It is psychotic ideological fuckheads like you that will be ruination of the future world. Fuck you. You repeat lies. You are a fucking lying piece of shit. Kill yourself.....now, and do the world a favor you slimy whore lawyer. Ice pick in the eye socket and push.
 
Quote from Ricter:

If A then B.
If B then C.
Therefore, if A then C.

If A is Ricter and
B is a speeding car then
A+B=C is Ricter squished on the highway by a speeding car. :D
 
Quote from Ricter:

His trolling is working on you.

We all know that FC is the actual troll on global warming threads... once in a while he gets a little excited when the facts overwhelm his preconceived opinions.

shutterstock_troll_0.jpg
 
Quote from gwb-trading:

We all know that FC is the actual troll on global warming threads... once in a while he gets a little excited when the facts overwhelm his preconceived opinions.
Melting ice does not lie.
 
you logic is pathetic.


If the set of causes could be multiple things.
based on that statement there is no way you can say one of those things causes warming.


Plus... I told you that statement on wikipedia did not cite the study.

the study will be next...





Quote from Ricter:

"The scientific opinion on climate change is that the Earth's climate system is unequivocally warming, and it is more than 90% certain that humans are causing most of it through activities that increase concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, such as deforestation and burning fossil fuels. "

jem says, "for ignorant fools like FC... let me make it clear... activities such as... deforestation (they left out cows, methane production, planting certain crops, perhaps even congregating in groups ) and burning of fossil fuels.... is not the same as saying man made co2 is cause the warming. "

You're wrong.

If A then B.
If B then C.
Therefore, if A then C.
 
this is world famous 97% study.

note for ignorants. it does not say man made co2 cause warming... it says human activity.


so there is no study showing that 97% of anyone says man made co2 causes warming.

again ricter if you wish to argue instead of being a clown....

cite the study. I will read it.


--


A poll performed by Peter Doran and Maggie Kendall Zimmerman at University of Illinois at Chicago received replies from 3,146 of the 10,257 polled Earth scientists. Results were analyzed globally and by specialization. 76 out of 79 climatologists who "listed climate science as their area of expertise and who also have published more than 50% of their recent peer-reviewed papers on the subject of climate change" believed that mean global temperatures had risen compared to pre-1800s levels. Seventy-five of 77 believed that human activity is a significant factor in changing mean global temperatures. Among all respondents, 90% agreed that temperatures have risen compared to pre-1800 levels, and 82% agreed that humans significantly influence the global temperature. Economic geologists and meteorologists were among the biggest doubters, with only 47 percent and 64 percent, respectively, believing in significant human involvement. The authors summarised the findings:
 
Quote from jem:

you logic is pathetic.


If the set of causes could be multiple things.
based on that statement there is no way you can say one of those things causes warming.


Plus... I told you that statement on wikipedia did not cite the study.

the study will be next...
You're wrong, the article in wikipedia does in fact mention the studies.
 
Back
Top