Global warming research suppressed due to intolerance of scepticism

[futurecurrents]

My point was, it contradicts your implication that there's a simple and clear relationship between CO2 levels and temps. In reality it's extremely complex and "climate scientists" don't understand it well enough to (accurately) model.


NASA Data: Global Warming Still on “Pause,” Sea Ice Hit Record
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/...bal-warming-still-on-pause-sea-ice-hit-record
Excuse #9: NASA scientist says pause in global warming just a ‘coincidence’
http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/28/e...bal-warming-just-a-coincidence/#ixzz32SVI4rpN

Yet again you show how clueless you are. Google Maunder Minimum, Dalton Minimum and Spörer Minimum. And if that's not enough, maybe you'll believe the Muslim outreachers at NASA:

Solar Variability and Terrestrial Climate
There is, however, a dawning realization among researchers that even these apparently tiny [solar] variations can have a significant effect on terrestrial climate. A new report issued by the National Research Council (NRC), "The Effects of Solar Variability on Earth's Climate," lays out some of the surprisingly complex ways that solar activity can make itself felt on our planet.
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2013/08jan_sunclimate/

No the relationship between CO2 and temperature levels is very strong. The level of CO2 largely determines the temps.

No the sun's output is not what causes the large ice ages.

No, the earth has NOT stopped or even slowed down it's warming.

So what were you babbling about?

 

[Trader666]

No the relationship between CO2 and temperature levels is very strong. The level of CO2 largely determines the temps.

Then show us a mathematical model that accurately describes the "very strong" relationship... a model that accounts for CO2 leading, lagging and being uncoupled for centuries at a time. You can't because it doesn't exist.

No the sun's output is not what causes the large ice ages.

LOL. You got caught with your foot in your mouth and now you're moving the goalposts. Here's what you originally wrote:

"Yes, it is not the sun. Level of output has been going down for the last forty years. Solar output changes have NEVER had a large influence on the earth's climate cycles. It has been orbital variations."​

Which is WRONG. Google Maunder Minimum, Dalton Minimum and Spörer Minimum. And if that's not enough, maybe you'll believe the Muslim outreachers at NASA:
Solar Variability and Terrestrial Climate
There is, however, a dawning realization among researchers that even these apparently tiny [solar] variations can have a significant effect on terrestrial climate. A new report issued by the National Research Council (NRC), "The Effects of Solar Variability on Earth's Climate," lays out some of the surprisingly complex ways that solar activity can make itself felt on our planet.
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2013/08jan_sunclimate/[/QUOTE]

No, the earth has NOT stopped or even slowed down it's warming.

NASA Data: Global Warming Still on “Pause,” Sea Ice Hit Record
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/...bal-warming-still-on-pause-sea-ice-hit-record
Excuse #9: NASA scientist says pause in global warming just a ‘coincidence’
http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/28/e...bal-warming-just-a-coincidence/#ixzz32SVI4rpN

 

[futurecurrents]

Global warming has NOT paused.

The oceans, which contain most the earth's heat continue to warm unabated.
Do I need to post the chart again?

It is CO2 levels that largely determine the earth's temperature. http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/lacis_01/

Then show us a mathematical model that accurately describes the "very strong" relationship... a model that accounts for CO2 leading, lagging and being uncoupled for centuries at a time. You can't because it doesn't exist.

LOL. You got caught with your foot in your mouth and now you're moving the goalposts. Here's what you originally wrote:

"Yes, it is not the sun. Level of output has been going down for the last forty years. Solar output changes have NEVER had a large influence on the earth's climate cycles. It has been orbital variations."​

Which is WRONG. Google Maunder Minimum, Dalton Minimum and Spörer Minimum. And if that's not enough, maybe you'll believe the Muslim outreachers at NASA:
Solar Variability and Terrestrial Climate
There is, however, a dawning realization among researchers that even these apparently tiny [solar] variations can have a significant effect on terrestrial climate. A new report issued by the National Research Council (NRC), "The Effects of Solar Variability on Earth's Climate," lays out some of the surprisingly complex ways that solar activity can make itself felt on our planet.
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2013/08jan_sunclimate/

NASA Data: Global Warming Still on “Pause,” Sea Ice Hit Record
http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/...bal-warming-still-on-pause-sea-ice-hit-record
Excuse #9: NASA scientist says pause in global warming just a ‘coincidence’
http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/28/e...bal-warming-just-a-coincidence/#ixzz32SVI4rpN[/QUOTE]

 

[Trader666]

Global warming has NOT paused.

The oceans, which contain most the earth's heat continue to warm unabated.
Do I need to post the chart again?

It is CO2 levels that largely determine the earth's temperature. http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/lacis_01/

So according to you the sun's irrelevant ("Solar output changes have NEVER had a large influence on the earth's climate cycles") but CO2 making up 1/2500th of the atmosphere "largely determines the temps" despite ALL other physical, chemical and biological processes that govern the planet and despite the fact that warming's paused for 16 years and "climate scientists" can't explain it? OK asshat. And on Halloween night candy witches flying on frosted wheat broomsticks will sprinkle purple pixie dust to absorb greenhouse gases and save the world if we all vote democrap and pay higher taxes.

 

[futurecurrents]

So according to you the sun's irrelevant ("Solar output changes have NEVER had a large influence on the earth's climate cycles") but CO2 making up 1/2500th of the atmosphere "largely determines the temps" despite ALL other physical, chemical and biological processes that govern the planet and despite the fact that warming's paused for 16 years and "climate scientists" can't explain it? OK asshat. And on Halloween night candy witches flying on frosted wheat broomsticks will sprinkle purple pixie dust to absorb greenhouse gases and save the world if we all vote democrap and pay higher taxes.

Try reading and you won't sound so stupid. The warming of the earth has not paused. Solar output variations have relatively minor effects on climate.

It is CO2 levels that largely determine the earth's temperature. http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/lacis_01/

The large scale changes were due to orbital changes which then effected relative solar gain across the hemispheres.

 

[Lucrum]

The Hard Sell on Climate Change
Media outlets continue to push a crisis scenario, and the public isn’t buying.

By John Fund

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/378653/hard-sell-climate-change-john-fund

 

[Trader666]

Try reading and you won't sound so stupid. The warming of the earth has not paused. Solar output variations have relatively minor effects on climate.

It is CO2 levels that largely determine the earth's temperature. http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/lacis_01/

The large scale changes were due to orbital changes which then effected relative solar gain across the hemispheres.

You would do well to take your own advice but you can't, you're a liberal. And a particularly stupid and delusional one at that.

 

[Trader666]

The Hard Sell on Climate Change
Media outlets continue to push a crisis scenario, and the public isn’t buying.

By John Fund

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/378653/hard-sell-climate-change-john-fund

Being detached from reality, libturds fail to realize that the more they politicize and push "climate science" the more they shoot themselves in the foot.

 

[wildchild]

More is coming out on this. These hoaxsters will stop at nothing.



http://www.spiegel.de/international...urrounding-respected-researcher-a-971033.html



"After joining a controversial lobby group critical of climate change, meteorologist Lennart Bengtsson claims he was shunned by colleagues, leading him to quit. Some scientists complain pressure to conform to consensus opinion has become a serious hindrance in the field.

News that Lennart Bengtsson, the respected former director of Germany's Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, had joined the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), sent shockwaves through the climate research community. GWPF is most notable for its skepticism about climate change and its efforts to undermine the position of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The tremors his decision sent through the scientific community shocked Bengtsson.

The scientist said colleagues placed so much pressure on him after joining GWPF that he withdrew from the group out of fear for his own health. Bengtsson added that his treatment had been reminiscent of the persecution of suspected Communists in the United States during the era of McCarthyism in the 1950s. "