Global Warming? Oklahoma Sets New Record, 28 Below

olias · Feb 11, 2011

Quote from pspr:

Did you see all the naked San Franciscans riding their bicycles? Any warming there is just God moving them a little closer to Hell.

because being naked is evil

shortie · Feb 11, 2011

Quote from olias:

because being naked is evil

or riding a bicycle

pspr · Feb 11, 2011

Quote from olias:

because being naked is evil

Sometimes it is. Have you never heard of indecent exposure laws? Or do you walk around naked all the time?

olias · Feb 11, 2011

Quote from 377OHMS:

But then you put quotation marks around "know" and "bullshit" but I employed neither word.

fair point, I guess I was just being lazy. But my point is still valid. You are trying to come across that you KNOW global warming is BULLSHIT. I am not insisting that I KNOW anything, and in fact, neither are the global warming proponents. We're simply saying the evidence sure looks that way. So you're accusation that it is 'religious zealotry' is just stupid and hypocritical.

[/QUOTE] quit trying to force your monastic tendencies on the rest of the world 'cause frankly we're kinda busy living normal lives and worrrying about paying for our asshole kids' university tuition. [/QUOTE]

I am not trying to 'force' my beliefs. We are debating, no? So you're saying I'm a douche (paraphrasing) because I'm of another opinion and not afraid to express and debate......wtf? That's pretty weak bro. I guess when you can no longer debate someone you pull out the 'stop trying to force your views' card. Pretty sad. I guess you'd prefer to see everyone agree with you. What's the fun of that?

olias · Feb 11, 2011

Quote from pspr:

Sometimes it is. Have you never heard of indecent exposure laws? Or do you walk around naked all the time?

OMG are you really that dim? I said 'evil', not 'against the law'.

are you wanting to debate the being naked is evil? fine, I'll listen. Why is it evil?

I happen to think it's nothing more than custom. Nothing evil about it at all.

pspr · Feb 11, 2011

Quote from olias:

..... I guess you'd prefer to see everyone agree with you. What's the fun of that?

We just like beating up on sheeple like yourself. There is no excuse for being ignorant.

BTW, did you look at the charts in the pdf file I linked for you?

http://www.jpands.org/vol12no3/robinson.pdf

pspr · Feb 11, 2011

Quote from olias:

OMG are you really that dim? I said 'evil', not 'against the law'.

are you wanting to debate the being naked is evil? fine, I'll listen. Why is it evil?

I happen to think it's nothing more than custom. Nothing evil about it at all.

You really are ignorant, aren't you? Not a custom. An immoral activity exposing yourself in public where there may be children.

FightTheFuture · Feb 11, 2011

Quote from pspr:

We just like beating up on sheeple like yourself. There is no excuse for being ignorant.

BTW, did you look at the charts in the pdf file I linked for you?

http://www.jpands.org/vol12no3/robinson.pdf

The believers never comment on any of the charts.

The believers only show the last 100 years on their charts. If they show more than that, they have learned to flatten the warmer and colder data to show a flat line and then show a straight line up over the past century to make it look really, really scary. Ooooooh.

They are silent when paleoclimatology data shows that if the earth gets only a degree or two colder, no food, no comment.

The believers deny that we are within an Ice Age, that we are in an interglacial warming period, that the earth in the last 5 million years has spent only a fraction of that time warm enough as it is now to sustain this human population.

Temperatures have been oscillating the last 5 million years, spending all but a fraction of that time too cold to sustain billions of people. We are approaching a peak in temperature. It has reached much warmer temperatures in the last 5 million years, but most of that time it has been too cold.

450 million years ago has it ever gotten this cold. For hundreds of millions of years it has been much, much warmer. Warmer is normal. Warmer is natural. Warmer is greener.

The believers actually think warmer temperatures are bad. One can only hope that will get warmer.

pspr · Feb 11, 2011

Quote from FightTheFuture:

The believers never comment on any of the charts.

The believers only show the last 100 years on their charts. If they show more than that, they have learned to flatten the warmer and colder data to show a flat line and then show a straight line up over the past century to make it look really, really scary. Ooooooh.

They are silent when paleoclimatology data shows that if the earth gets only a degree or two colder, no food, no comment.

The believers deny that we are within an Ice Age, that we are in an interglacial warming period, that the earth in the last 5 million years has spent only a fraction of that time warm enough as it is now to sustain this human population.

Temperatures have been oscillating the last 5 million years, spending all but a fraction of that time too cold to sustain billions of people. We are approaching a peak in temperature. It has reached much warmer temperatures in the last 5 million years, but most of that time it has been too cold.

450 million years ago has it ever gotten this cold. For hundreds of millions of years it has been much, much warmer. Warmer is normal. Warmer is natural. Warmer is greener.

The believers actually think warmer temperatures are bad. One can only hope that will get warmer.

Good points. The Al Gore deciples won't even look at that link. Research is taboo to them. Commenting on real research is their kiss of death.

Lucrum · Feb 11, 2011

Quote from pspr:

Good points. The Al Gore deciples won't even look at that link. Research is taboo to them. Commenting on real research is their kiss of death.

Yep they ignore or bury their head in the sand any time someone points out "inconvenient truths".

<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Gm8vaH8LEV0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/640AIJR38Pc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/AJyAQmxIbJk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/6SRzw-52plg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/naLfstuaBRE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/tMeuHNgT0PA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Now Burt is NOT a climatologist nor does he claim to be. But he is a world renowned engineer and is very good with numbers and statistics. Which is what he's examining in the videos.