Global warming LOL

[blah12345678]

Quote from futurecurrents:

It's sort of my pet cause. I have a degree in environmental science. I'm sick of seeing all the ignorance, ideological delusions, misconceptions and just plain stupidity about AGW, most of it coming from the science-antagonistic and science-ignorant right.

Meanwhile, no one ever mentions the idea that since 50,000 BC, approximately 90-120 Billion people have come and gone on this rock. 75-105 Billion of those people have come and gone just in the last 109 years. Add the 7 Billion currently living, and we have a whole lot of carbon dioxide spewing going on..

So maybe the warming is man-made in the sense that a whole lot of exhaling is going on.

Perhaps the climatologists ought to be embracing population control. That seems to be the real problem. And it happens to be a problem with easier solutions....

Check out this site if you don't believe me....

http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/

 

[futurecurrents]

Quote from jem:

FC --- I can not tell if you are nuts or just a crazy troll.

So I propose a test.
If you are a troll you will avoid answering this question.
If you are demented this will not register on your brain.
If you have a shred of intelligence you will click the links I post below and admit your are ignorant or stupid.

Test... Intro

Please click on the links below.
Note the graphs of the 73 Climate models.
Look at observed temperatures at the bottom of the charts.



http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/CMIP5-73-models-vs-obs-20N-20S-MT.png


http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/CMIP5-73-models-vs-obs-20N-20S-MT-5-yr-means1.png
-----------------


Test question...

Did any of the 73 models predict the non warming we see now?

Bonus question...

Would models which failed to predict the current non warming...
be successful models or failed models.

Maybe you look at fraudulent hack sources like Spencer since you a loyal right wing sheep, but I don't. Get back to me with something from NOAA or any other reputable source of science, not a hack or paid shill for the denier apparatus like Spency boy

No climate model can be proved a failure based on cherry picked points spanning a few years. It is CLIMATE not .weather.

The earth has not stopped or even barely slowed down it's warming.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from futurecurrents:

The earth has not stopped or even barely slowed down it's warming.

Then why is it 62 deg F in Atlanta, in August?

 

[gwb-trading]

Quote from Lucrum:

Then why is it 62 deg F in Atlanta, in August?

This global warming is killing us.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from gwb-trading:

This global warming is killing us.

It's killing the bikini season that's for sure.

Took my granddaughter to the play ground yesterday and noticed virtually no one at the community pool. It was too cool for swimming, in August. In the deep south. Local weatherman said we're experiencing the equivalent of Oct weather right now

Maybe I should take her to the north pole instead. According to the alarmists there's a heat wave up there.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from futurecurrents:

It's sort of my pet cause. I have a degree in environmental science.

And you decided to waste your life installing heat and air units? Why bother with such a worthless degree to begin with?

I'm sick of seeing all the ignorance, ideological delusions, misconceptions and just plain stupidity about AGW, most of it coming from the science-antagonistic and science-ignorant right.

And just how many deniers have you converted here on ET to date? By my count, it's ZERO. Obviously you are a complete failure at your "pet cause".

 

[Ricter]

Quote from gwb-trading:

This global warming is killing us.

You're ok with the local conditions "argument" when it suits you.

 

[jem]

you demented troll. You were not asked about the source you were asked about the data.

if you wish to show those were not the predictions of the 73 weather models... you are going to need to provide links.

Air temperature has not warmed for 16 years.
That is what has been modeled.
That is the only science you had show man made co2 causes warming.
Your models failed... I provided proof... you did not respond with any substance.

Quote from futurecurrents:

Maybe you look at fraudulent hack sources like Spencer since you a loyal right wing sheep, but I don't. Get back to me with something from NOAA or any other reputable source of science, not a hack or paid shill for the denier apparatus like Spency boy

No climate model can be proved a failure based on cherry picked points spanning a few years. It is CLIMATE not .weather.

The earth has not stopped or even barely slowed down it's warming.

 

[Ricter]

Is there a chance land temperatures will resume rising like they did after the last big pause?

 

[jem]

of course temps could go up ... the earth cycles.


The difficulty is trying to discern if man is impacting the earth enough to modify those cycles.
My reading and the links I presented a few months ago show that using the best statistical methods there has been no warming outside of what can be expected from natural variation since the Industrial revolution.

So if you said perhaps we should be careful about pollution or control pollution I would agree. I am disputing wealth transfers based on lies about what the science shows... but trolls like FC.

The models have failed. The creators of the models admit they to make new models which include the sun and the tides.

The new buzz word seems to be the earth is not as climate sensitive as thought (CO2 is implied because they do not want to be plainly outed as past fools).

Its showing up in the articles.