Global warming LOL

Quote from jem:

We should note.. .that fraudulent survey FC likes to quote... is old. The science of agw has now failed. The new surveys show its closer to 50 50.
More...

Why is FC so incredibly invested in GW? We had one poster here that had 19,000 posts. He hated religious conservatives. It turned out that was because the wouldn't let him have sex with children, right? This FC idiot is similar but why so invested in GW?
 
Quote from Eight:

Why is FC so incredibly invested in GW? We had one poster here that had 19,000 posts. He hated religious conservatives. It turned out that was because the wouldn't let him have sex with children, right? This FC idiot is similar but why so invested in GW?
More...
Hard to say though he admits he installs air conditioners for a living.


(not that there's anything wrong with that)
 
Quote from Lucrum:

Hard to say though he admits he installs air conditioners for a living.


(not that there's anything wrong with that)
More...

too much time in those sun-baked attics installing ducts maybe..
 
Quote from jem:

We should note.. .that fraudulent survey FC likes to quote... is old. The science of agw has now failed. The new surveys show its closer to 50 50.
More...



You're simply wrong and a lying piece of shit. Why do you lie so much? What the fuck is wrong with you?

The science of AGW has certainly NOT failed.

Multiple methods show 97% and all the world's science orgs agree that man is responsible for nearly all the warming over the last 40- 50 years. Then and now. Please try to keep up.
 
Powell-Science-Pie-Chart.png



red-box.png



http://theconsensusproject.com/#sharePage
 
Quote from Eight:

Why is FC so incredibly invested in GW? We had one poster here that had 19,000 posts. He hated religious conservatives. It turned out that was because the wouldn't let him have sex with children, right? This FC idiot is similar but why so invested in GW?
More...

It's sort of my pet cause. I have a degree in environmental science. I'm sick of seeing all the ignorance, ideological delusions, misconceptions and just plain stupidity about AGW, most of it coming from the science-antagonistic and science-ignorant right.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

It's sort of my pet cause. I have a degree in environmental science. I'm sick of seeing all the ignorance, ideological delusions, misconceptions and just plain stupidity about AGW, most of it coming from the science-antagonistic and science-ignorant right.
More...

this is the same futurescurrents who just lied about the climate models just a few posts back?
 
Quote from jem:

this is the same futurescurrents who just lied about the climate models just a few posts back?
More...


jem, you are worse than stupid. You are a sick, twisted smart. Able to argue any point regardless of it's innate truth. Perfect for being a lawyer.
 
FC --- I can not tell if you are nuts or just a crazy troll.

So I propose a test.
If you are a troll you will avoid answering this question.
If you are demented this will not register on your brain.
If you have a shred of intelligence you will click the links I post below and admit your are ignorant or stupid.

Test... Intro

Please click on the links below.
Note the graphs of the 73 Climate models.
Look at observed temperatures at the bottom of the charts.



http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/CMIP5-73-models-vs-obs-20N-20S-MT.png


http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/CMIP5-73-models-vs-obs-20N-20S-MT-5-yr-means1.png
-----------------


Test question...

Did any of the 73 models predict the non warming we see now?

Bonus question...

Would models which failed to predict the current non warming...
be successful models or failed models.



Quote from futurecurrents:

jem, you are worse than stupid. You are a sick, twisted smart. Able to argue any point regardless of it's innate truth. Perfect for being a lawyer.
More...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top