Global warming is a fact!

Quote from PiggyBank:

Why the fuck does this "evidence' need to be spun at all? First, it is NOT statistically significant. Second, it does not in any way prove that humanity is responsible for global warming.

Quote from dcraig:

Still making stuff up are you? Your conspiracy theories are utterly ridiculous. Those scientists come from research institutions and universities from all around the world. Furthermore the evidence is regarded as both sound and overwhelming by every national science academy, scientific society or professional body of international standing that has published a public statement. Why should anybody take a blind bit of notice of your wild conspiracy theories?
 
Quote from dcraig:

Still making stuff up are you? Your conspiracy theories are utterly ridiculous. Those scientists come from research institutions and universities from all around the world. Furthermore the evidence is regarded as both sound and overwhelming by every national science academy, scientific society or professional body of international standing that has published a public statement. Why should anybody take a blind bit of notice of your wild conspiracy theories?

That's nice your self selected group think societies say the evidence is sound and overwhelming for the tooth fairy.

Fine , just don't try to impose excess costs on us to allay your fears of your new found tooth fairy induced eschatology scenario.
 
^ what conspiracy theories???

This "evidence" cited right here is not enough to draw anything but a wild, random guess from, it is that simple.
 
Quote from PiggyBank:

Why the fuck does this "evidence' need to be spun at all? First, it is NOT statistically significant. Second, it does not in any way prove that humanity is responsible for global warming.

You misunderstand the nature of science. Science does not depend on proof. Mathematics depends on proof. Science depends on evidence. And the evidence for AGW is overwhelming. It ranges from the basic physics of GHGs, the measured radiative imbalance of the earth (more energy in than out), the statistically significant trend in global surface temperature, the statistically significant trend of increasing ocean heat content, the shrinking glaciers, polar ice and Greenland ice sheet, the compelling evidence of the major role of CO2 in regulating temperature from studies of the earths past climate, the highly accurate measurement of the increase of atmospheric CO2 and the isotopic studies showing the increase to be of human origin.

Most of all, there is no other feasible explanation for the rapid rise in temperature. And other possible causes have been exhaustively examined. It's not the sun - it's the coolest in a century. It's not cosmic rays. It's not ENSO. etc etc.

You can choose to assert that the evidence is not convincing, but that is not the conclusion of expert scientific opinion. Any rational person will go with the science, especially when the risk is so high.
 
Quote from dcraig:

You misunderstand the nature of science. Science does not depend on proof. Mathematics depends on proof. Science depends on evidence. And the evidence for AGW is overwhelming. It ranges from the basic physics of GHGs, the measured radiative imbalance of the earth (more energy in than out), the statistically significant trend in global surface temperature, the statistically significant trend of increasing ocean heat content, the shrinking glaciers, polar ice and Greenland ice sheet, the compelling evidence of the major role of CO2 in regulating temperature from studies of the earths past climate, the highly accurate measurement of the increase of atmospheric CO2 and the isotopic studies showing the increase to be of human origin.

Most of all, there is no other feasible explanation for the rapid rise in temperature. And other possible causes have been exhaustively examined. It's not the sun - it's the coolest in a century. It's not cosmic rays. It's not ENSO. etc etc.

You can choose to assert that the evidence is not convincing, but that is not the conclusion of expert scientific opinion. Any rational person will go with the science, especially when the risk is so high.

No thanks peddle your extortion scams elsewhere.
 
Quote from PiggyBank:

^ what conspiracy theories???

This "evidence" cited right here is not enough to draw anything but a wild, random guess from, it is that simple.

The wild accusations that scientists have deliberately falsified data. What rock have you been living under?
 
Quote from Index piker:

No thanks peddle your extortion scams elsewhere.

You are descending to ridiculous nonsense. As a matter of fact, I agree with James Hansen who unequivocally condemns carbon trading schemes.
 
Quote from dcraig:

You are descending to ridiculous nonsense. As a matter of fact, I agree with James Hansen who unequivocally condemns carbon trading schemes.
Sorry but it's your delusional comrades that have descended into frivolous nonsense solutions.

I'll ask you what risk does gw pose?
 
Quote from Index piker:

That's nice your self selected group think societies say the evidence is sound and overwhelming for the tooth fairy.

These are the peak bodies of world science. You know, the science that modern civilization is built upon.
 
Back
Top