look at those excuses...
likely to be...
reliable until they diverged...
occam's razor would tell you the divergence is most likely caused by upward adjustments of the instrument data not that all of sudden the tree rings "broke".
but at the very least in one paragraph your scientist is admitting that the graphs I chose were telling the truth.
yet you called them lies you anti science troll.
Lying POS
I think you are talking to Fruitcakes whom I have on ignore. ---I would like to point out, that that particular miscreant doesn't pay much attention to anything prior to 1800. He/she is not a truthful individual and does not look at all the facts.
look at those excuses...
likely to be...
reliable until they diverged...
occam's razor would tell you the divergence is most likely caused by upward adjustments of the instrument data not that all of sudden the tree rings "broke".
but at the very least in one paragraph your scientist is admitting that the graphs I chose were telling the truth.
yet you called them lies you anti science troll.
No, I'm calling you a liar.