Global warming hoax

Looks like nothing can be called a science until it receives funding from the government.

Einstein is supposed to have been familiar with and made references to Tesla's term and description of scalar energy. Modern physics rarely refers to scalar maybe because it has zero frequencies so it cannot be measured by current frequency instruments.

It sounds like orgone is similar to scalar. Someday someone will take credit for the work of others, as having discovered it.

My guess is that all living things are more than just a chemical soup. Not nearly all is known in the universe. I think there may be such a thing as orgone, but why is no one from the scientific community with super star credentials taking it seriously? Can they not imagine a use for it? I suppose if a scientist can imagine making a weapon out of orgone as some have claimed of scalar, he will receive plenty of funding and maybe the Nobel Peace Prize!
 
Quote from Hydroblunt:

Really?

Like I said, go stand in downtown LA. If you think there is no warming effect, you have no clue.
More...

Read the post directly above.

Like I said, global warming is not science.
 
Quote from FightTheFuture:

Looks like nothing can be called a science until it receives funding from the government.

Einstein is supposed to have been familiar with and made references to Tesla's term and description of scalar energy. Modern physics rarely refers to scalar maybe because it has zero frequencies so it cannot be measured by current frequency instruments.

It sounds like orgone is similar to scalar. Someday someone will take credit for the work of others, as having discovered it.

My guess is that all living things are more than just a chemical soup. Not nearly all is known in the universe. I think there may be such a thing as orgone, but why is no one from the scientific community with super star credentials taking it seriously? Can they not imagine a use for it? I suppose if a scientist can imagine making a weapon out of orgone as some have claimed of scalar, he will receive plenty of funding and maybe the Nobel Peace Prize!
More...

It's not surprising that people who are completely ignorant are the ones most anti-science. This guy have absolutely no clue what a "scalar" is. "Zero frequencies?" No wonder people won't take you seriously.

There are numerous examples of fringe (ie, not generally accepted) models in science becoming mainstream theories once observations confirm the model. Big Bang is one such example. The idea of all scientists conspiring together to shut out a few models not to their liking betrays your own ignorance.
 
Quote from james_bond_3rd:

It's not surprising that people who are completely ignorant are the ones most anti-science. This guy have absolutely no clue what a "scalar" is. "Zero frequencies?" No wonder people won't take you seriously.

There are numerous examples of fringe (ie, not generally accepted) models in science becoming mainstream theories once observations confirm the model. Big Bang is one such example. The idea of all scientists conspiring together to shut out a few models not to their liking betrays your own ignorance.
More...

Tesla the Great One described scalar as a result of two equal frequencies converging from opposite vectors canceling each other out resulting in a non-Hertzian energy, no frequencies, it's a standing energy, stationary energy, zero frequencies, static energy.

I suppose modern scientists have used different language to describe it so they can take credit for Tesla's work. Typical of all them young punks today. Old science with a new name and description.

What makes you think I'm anti-science? Because I don't totally agree with the cause of GW, your favorite science project? Everyone must agree with you? Now I see how the pro GW scientists make the nonbelievers look bad. Science must not be criticized, like the church was not to be criticized not too long ago.

There is no need for scientists to conspire, it is only natural human behavior to be competitive and egotistical. I don't believe in dark, sinister conspiracies, just boondoggle and pork policies. All aboard the gravy train.
 
Quote from FightTheFuture:

Tesla the Great One described scalar as a result of two equal frequencies converging from opposite vectors canceling each other out resulting in a non-Hertzian energy, no frequencies, it's a standing energy, stationary energy, zero frequencies, static energy.

I suppose modern scientists have used different language to describe it so they can take credit for Tesla's work. Typical of all them young punks today. Old science with a new name and description.

What makes you think I'm anti-science? Because I don't totally agree with the cause of GW, your favorite science project? Everyone must agree with you? Now I see how the pro GW scientists make the nonbelievers look bad. Science must not be criticized, like the church was not to be criticized not too long ago.

There is no need for scientists to conspire, it is only natural human behavior to be competitive and egotistical. I don't believe in dark, sinister conspiracies, just boondoggle and pork policies. All aboard the gravy train.
More...

You are talking sheer nonsense and you don't even know it.

A scalar wave is a field that has a value but no direction. An example of a scalar wave is a pressure wave (ie, a sound wave). A vector wave is a field that has both a value (the field strength) and a direction. Light is a vector wave. BTW, don't confuse the direction of the field with the direction of the wave propagation. These are two different things.

When two propagating waves of the same frequency go in the opposite directions, they form a standing wave. A standing wave can be either a vector wave or a scalar wave. An example of a vector standing wave, is the electromagnetic wave in the antenna of a radio. An example of a scalar standing wave, is the vibrating string of a violin.

"Tesla the Great One" never described a scalar wave in the terms you used. You are both ignorant and anti-science. Stop being a fool.
 
Quote from james_bond_3rd:

You are talking sheer nonsense and you don't even know it.

A scalar wave is a field that has a value but no direction. An example of a scalar wave is a pressure wave (ie, a sound wave). A vector wave is a field that has both a value (the field strength) and a direction. Light is a vector wave. BTW, don't confuse the direction of the field with the direction of the wave propagation. These are two different things.

When two propagating waves of the same frequency go in the opposite directions, they form a standing wave. A standing wave can be either a vector wave or a scalar wave. An example of a vector standing wave, is the electromagnetic wave in the antenna of a radio. An example of a scalar standing wave, is the vibrating string of a violin.

"Tesla the Great One" never described a scalar wave in the terms you used. You are both ignorant and anti-science. Stop being a fool.
More...

Both Tesla and I are ignorant and anti-science? Wow! If I only knew more about why every planet in the solar system is heating up just like the earth.

I thought scientists did not get emotional. Who are you really working for, Mr. Bond, if that's your real name? I bet you are one of them aren't you. Did your people destroy Tesla's and Rife's scalar work, so they could rewrite it to their credit?

Tesla never worked on the science of GW, but actually contributed to GW because of his various inventions, such as alternating current produced by coal-burning plants. Is that why you hate him?

I don't hate science, I don't distrust science. I do know that science is not perfect, but some people seem to think it is perfect or sell it as being perfect and never wrong.

A lot of modern science starts out as an inevitable failure because it is politically motivated and just ends up in name calling. GW will never amount to anything. Then they will move on to some other crisis. Politically motivated science is losing its credibility and giving all of science a bad name. Not a good thing to let happen.

Science is never wrong. Science is harmless. I must admit that modern science has contributed lots, atomic bomb, cancer caused by the products of science, 1300 Superfund sites to cleanup and science never saw it coming.
 
1. i think it is important not to mix up science and the
business following scientific findings.

2. and i think that someone can be brilliant AND weird.
tesla for example had numerous paranoid abnormities.
there is absolute no doubt about that as well as there
is tons of proof of his brilliance.

all conspiracy theories, like the one on tesla's main
findings being stolen by the government, since a concept
like unlimited engery everywhere would change everything,
build upon our doubt towards authorities in the first
place. IMO. but the problem is that there truly ARE
conspiracies. CIA research on altering people's mind IS
true. it is very difficult to distinguish false conspiracies
from real ones, but it is IMO stupid to take each and
every possible one as given.
 
a while ago i checked this japanese man, who crystallises
water with different names on it like "love" or "peace"
and watches how it looks like. at first glance stunningly
different pictures with positive and negative words. then
somewhere in between it was mentioned that it took
them up to 50 tries to capture the phenomenon. and
i was like "wait a minute", they decide out of so many
which one "fits" their expectation? i am not sure if i am
doing him wrong. i did not thoroughly look at it. but it is
this kind of detail which might explain some "phenomena" ...
and maybe as well some "conspiracies" ... . take hope,
curiosity, some research and wishful thinking ... voila.
 
To a marginal degree, i disagree, man.
If tesla was paranoid, then about what?I didnt know him personally, im guessing you didnt either, from all my reading, there is abundant evidence to suggest he was a right bastard to work or deal with-wouldnt matter how brilliant he may have been.

"Doubt" toward government dealings, "authorities" come on, there is scarcely a country on the planet not affected in some way directly by its governements secret, illegal weapons or other testings, based entirely on fact and the records of the organisations involved themselves.

As for global warming, or free energy-ugh, those cannot possibly be huge concerns, given the record of these bastards.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top