Global warming hoax

Quote from james_bond_3rd:

Now I know that you are the same as ratboy and "filter" out my posts. If you ignore my posts, then why do you pose questions to me?
More...

I don't filter your posts. I challenged you to post ONE study proving GW is anthropogenic. You posted a link to a book. Here's the table of contents from that book.........

Contents
Uncertainties of Global Climate Prédictions L Bengtsson 15

Uncertainties in the Atmospheric Chemical System G P Brasseur E A H Holland 31

General Consideration and Applications 41

Biogeophysical Feedbacks and the Dynamics of Climate M Claussen 61

Should Phosphorus Availability Be Constraining Moist Tropical Forest Responses to Increasing CO2 Concentrations? 95

Biogeochemical Consequences of Woody Plant Expansion S Archer T W Boutton

I doubt a book with "Uncertainties" in the table of contents can be cited as "proof". But I'm sure it's an interesting read. Unlike you, I HAVE considered both sides and still do. Unlike you, I am not blinded by hysteria. I consider the arguments based on reasoning, not emotion. I've tried to engage you in a debate before, but you either attack me personally or just ignore the points I make. Truth is there is a debate on GW and it's effects and causes.
 
Quote from Arnie:

I don't filter your posts. I challenged you to post ONE study proving GW is anthropogenic. You posted a link to a book. Here's the table of contents from that book.........

Contents
Uncertainties of Global Climate Prédictions L Bengtsson 15

Uncertainties in the Atmospheric Chemical System G P Brasseur E A H Holland 31

General Consideration and Applications 41

Biogeophysical Feedbacks and the Dynamics of Climate M Claussen 61

Should Phosphorus Availability Be Constraining Moist Tropical Forest Responses to Increasing CO2 Concentrations? 95

Biogeochemical Consequences of Woody Plant Expansion S Archer T W Boutton

I doubt a book with "Uncertainties" in the table of contents can be cited as "proof". But I'm sure it's an interesting read. Unlike you, I HAVE considered both sides and still do. Unlike you, I am not blinded by hysteria. I consider the arguments based on reasoning, not emotion. I've tried to engage you in a debate before, but you either attack me personally or just ignore the points I make. Truth is there is a debate on GW and it's effects and causes.
More...

It's evident that you didn't read the book then. It is in the true scientific spirit that with any study one needs to address the uncertainties. But if you confuse the discussion of uncertainties with stating "we don't know," then you're just showing your ignorance of science.

BTW, in court, DNA evidence always leaves 1 in a billion or similar "uncertainties." That's enough to convict most criminals (except Simpson).
 
Why do I have the feeling that the people who believe that global warming is a fraud also believe that the Atkins diet is safe and healthful?
 
Quote from maxpi:

A horrendous amount of "science" outside of global warming is too... it's just amazing the level of delusion that can be sustained for so many years/generations...
More...
Extraordinary Popular Delusions & the Madness of Crowds
 
Quote from Thunderdog:

Why do I have the feeling that the people who believe that global warming is a fraud also believe that the Atkins diet is safe and healthful?
More...

You don't have to go that far. We already have proof on this forum that following groups of people have significant overlap among them:

1. Those who think that GW is a fraud;
2. Those who think that earth is 6k years old;
3. Those who believe that praying heals;
4. Those who believe that praying brings rain;
5. Those who voted for Bush.
 
Quote from Thunderdog:

Why do I have the feeling that the people who believe that global warming is a fraud also believe that the Atkins diet is safe and healthful?
More...

because you have been brainwashed your whole life and you are too stupid to figure it out.
 
Quote from ratboy88:

because you have been brainwashed your whole life and you are too stupid to figure it out.
More...

Oh, and I forgot the nonconservative cuckoo side of ignorance:

1. Those who think that GW is a fraud;
2. Those who think that 9/11 was a government job;
3. Those who think that aliens are running the government;
4. Those who think that Big Oil murdered Stan Meyers because he invented water to hydrogen fuel cell.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top