Global warming hoax fools millions

Quote from bigdavediode:

Someone has picked those years specifically to manipulate you.
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Gm8vaH8LEV0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Gm8vaH8LEV0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/640AIJR38Pc?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/640AIJR38Pc?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/AJyAQmxIbJk?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/AJyAQmxIbJk?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6SRzw-52plg?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6SRzw-52plg?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/naLfstuaBRE?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/naLfstuaBRE?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tMeuHNgT0PA?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tMeuHNgT0PA?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
 
Not only have I told you several times, it's the TITLE of the chart. What part of "severe winters" don't you understand?

Littledaviedumbass is the Baghdad Bob of global warming :p


<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/TrXhxmQJSS0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/TrXhxmQJSS0?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
Quote from bigdavediode:

Someone has picked those years specifically to manipulate you.

Or can you come up with a reason such odd years were picked?
 
Quote from Trader666:

To discredit the IPCC, just click here:

Lest anyone was actually going to believe that particular falsehood that Trader 666 linked to, here's a quote fromHulme, the guy who (the article claimed) said that man-made global warming was only supported by a few dozen experts and misleads people:

"I did not say the ‘IPCC misleads’ anyone – it is claims that are made by other commentators, such as the caricatured claim I offer in the paper, that have the potential to mislead." -- Mike Hulme

http://deepclimate.org/2010/06/15/mike-hulme-sets-lawrence-solomon-and-marcmorano-straight/

On to your next falsehood, Trader666! I'm sure this won't even slow you down.
 
LMAO! Hulme issued two hilarious backpedaling "clarifications" after he got nailed for slipping and telling the truth.

Instead of your pro-hoax website, let's look at a few original documents from Hulme and the IPCC.

The first is what Hulme originally wrote and the source is his website. I've highlighted the "2500" number and his acknowledgment that consensus in IPCC reports is normally reached by "only a few dozen experts."

Without a careful explanation about what it means, this drive for consensus can leave the IPCC vulnerable to outside criticism. Claims such as '2,500 of the world's leading scientists have reached a consensus that human activities are having a significant influence on the climate' are disingenuous. That particular consensus judgement, as are many others in the IPCC reports, is reached by only a few dozen experts in the specific field of detection and attribution studies; other IPCC authors are experts in other fields.
http://mikehulme.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Hulme-Mahony-PiPG.pdf

Where did that "2500" number come from? The IPCC used to claim or imply a consensus that large all the time. For example, here's a slide from a 2007 IPCC briefing given by the IPCC Chairman no less. Source for this is the IPCC's website:

attachment.php


http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/presentations/valencia-2007-11/pachauri-17-november-2007.pdf
Quote from bigdavediode:

Lest anyone was actually going to believe that particular falsehood that Trader 666 linked to, here's a quote fromHulme, the guy who (the article claimed) said that man-made global warming was only supported by a few dozen experts and misleads people:

"I did not say the 'IPCC misleads' anyone ' it is claims that are made by other commentators, such as the caricatured claim I offer in the paper, that have the potential to mislead." -- Mike Hulme

http://deepclimate.org/2010/06/15/mike-hulme-sets-lawrence-solomon-and-marcmorano-straight/

On to your next falsehood, Trader666! I'm sure this won't even slow you down.
 

Attachments

Quote from Trader666:

LMAO! Hulme issued two hilarious backpedaling "clarifications" after he got nailed for slipping and telling the truth.

Instead of your pro-hoax website, let's look at a few original documents from Hulme and the IPCC.

See? It didn't even slow you down, you just recite another "selective" quotation.

The problem is, that according to you he's lying now, which makes him a liar.

Which means you just cited a liar.

On to your next falsehood! What will it be next? We're all waiting in anticipation! :)

Here's his original statement:

http://go2.wordpress.com/?id=725X13...0/01/Correcting-reports-of-the-PiPG-paper.pdf

Here's Hulme's entire correction of the false newspaper report:

http://go2.wordpress.com/?id=725X13...0/01/Correcting-reports-of-the-PiPG-paper.pdf
 
Of course all you can do is desperately try to obfuscate. I say "try" because you can't even post correct links.

I posted an excerpt from Hulme's original document and gave the link from his website... it's no coincidence that IPCC had been using the number "2500" and I gave a link to that too from IPCC's website.

Keep trying littledaviedumbass... your ignorance makes you the perfect pawn for the IPCC's lies.
Quote from bigdavediode:

See? It didn't even slow you down, you just recite another "selective" quotation.

The problem is, that according to you he's lying now, which makes him a liar.

Which means you just cited a liar.

On to your next falsehood! What will it be next? We're all waiting in anticipation! :)

Here's his original statement:

http://go2.wordpress.com/?id=725X13...0/01/Correcting-reports-of-the-PiPG-paper.pdf

Here's Hulme's entire correction of the false newspaper report:

http://go2.wordpress.com/?id=725X13...0/01/Correcting-reports-of-the-PiPG-paper.pdf
 
Back
Top