Global warming hoax fools millions
- Thread starter wilburbear
- Start date
Quote from Petsamo:
No, but they brain-wash them.
Some do, undoubtedly, just as some religious fundamentalists brainwash their children.
So what does that have to do with anything?
(I like the little icon, by the way -- it's very funny.)
I already explained it, littledaviedumbass. Read my posts as many times as it takes or have an adult explain them to you.
I'm not surprised you're confused though... after all, you don't even understand how basic graphs and y-axis labels work, you couldn't find a link that was given to you in black and white, and you can't search a file for the word "debt."
Why don't you learn a trade or get an education or do something, anything to improve your life? Spewing nonsense on ET all day long won't get you anywhere.
I'm not surprised you're confused though... after all, you don't even understand how basic graphs and y-axis labels work, you couldn't find a link that was given to you in black and white, and you can't search a file for the word "debt."
Why don't you learn a trade or get an education or do something, anything to improve your life? Spewing nonsense on ET all day long won't get you anywhere.
So even after having been slapped in the face with it, you won't answer that the analogy is accurate?
Really? Are you so tied to your position that your ego won't let go of it? It's only one graph, but you can't even admit that even that one graph is a bad graph? That picking random years is absolutely wrong?
What happens if you admit that you're wrong -- do you feel that makes you somehow a bad person or inferior in some way?
You are aware that this character trait will kill you in the markets, right?
Projecting again littledaviedumbass? That won't help you either.
As I explained (and is also clear from the title of the chart) they're NOT "random years." Can't you get anything right?
You're a pathetic joke. But what else would we expect from the one who doesn't even understand basic graphs and axes?
You may want to seriously consider bettering your life instead of wasting it spewing nonsense on ET.
As I explained (and is also clear from the title of the chart) they're NOT "random years." Can't you get anything right?
You're a pathetic joke. But what else would we expect from the one who doesn't even understand basic graphs and axes?
You may want to seriously consider bettering your life instead of wasting it spewing nonsense on ET.
They... are... random... years... from... a... nonglobal... data... set.
Also, it's an excellent example of cherry picking. Come on, be honest -- you know it's a bad graph.
Anyone reading this can see it's a bad graph. Including yourself.
What's the down side for you to just admit that? You think I'm going to pick on you for citing a bad graph? Anyone who is an adult who is curious has cited bad information at one time or another. Adults admit error and move on. Children attack each other for imperfections -- adults don't (or shouldn't, anyway.)
Sure, some people don't grow out of this phase and still behave like children in a playground -- but a mature person understands that understanding his own faults is how a person learns.
Grasping at straws in your desperation to save face is only making you look worse. Stop digging.
You contradict yourself here. Random and cherry picked are mutually exclusive, littledaviedumbass.
The graph is good because it's a comparison of the monthly AO index at key events (severe winters) of the last 60 years. A trading analogy would be like looking at monthly readings of the A/D line at key market bottoms of the last 60 years.
Your confusion, even after I explained the graph to you yesterday, shows you can't grasp the difference between key events on one timeframe and a random jumble of multiple timeframes.
"do you use constant 15 minute bars, or do you use a 3 minute, 8 minute, 15 minute, then seven minute, and a two minute bar"
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2973555#post2973555
Be honest with yourself for a change. And grow up. Throwing a tantrum doesn't change reality. Anyone reading this (except maybe you) can see you're a childish brat who doesn't know his ass from his elbow.
You contradict yourself here. Random and cherry picked are mutually exclusive, littledaviedumbass.
The graph is good because it's a comparison of the monthly AO index at key events (severe winters) of the last 60 years. A trading analogy would be like looking at monthly readings of the A/D line at key market bottoms of the last 60 years.
Your confusion, even after I explained the graph to you yesterday, shows you can't grasp the difference between key events on one timeframe and a random jumble of multiple timeframes.
"do you use constant 15 minute bars, or do you use a 3 minute, 8 minute, 15 minute, then seven minute, and a two minute bar"
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2973555#post2973555
Be honest with yourself for a change. And grow up. Throwing a tantrum doesn't change reality. Anyone reading this (except maybe you) can see you're a childish brat who doesn't know his ass from his elbow.
This from the one who I exposed as a poser 
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2788731#post2788731
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2788731#post2788731
Actually you make a good point here -- they're not "random" they are only so bizarre as to look random. Someone has picked those years specifically to manipulate you.
Or can you come up with a reason such odd years were picked?
If someone presented a trade to me and said "Hey, look at these averages from 1977, 1988, 1989, 1994, 2008" -- isn't this meaningful? I'd punch them in the groin, but not everybody would. Some people would start handing over their money, like yourself.
On the bright side, folks like me will protect folks like you from these charlatans.