Global warming hoax fools millions

Quote from phenomena:

Why couldn't it be is the wrong question, why would it be is a better one. It's beside the point. It's money that I and my children, and probably grand children will have to pay back. Money for an "economic stimulus" which is going to teach africans how to wash their penises.

I get it, you guys support it. You guys are okay with millions being spent on "stimulus activities" such as penis washing instruction. You guys are okay with you and your offspring being stuck with the tab for this nonsense. That doesn't make it constitutional.

I've never said I'm okay with it, just that there's no reason whatsoever to think that HIV prevention programs would be unconstitutional.
 
The internet was created because of military spending during the cold war, not because of penis washing programs.

Are you advocating more military spending?! Even though the internet came of it, I can't say I favor more military spending.

Quote from hermit:

Just like the current generation is paying the price for all that research into 'sending pornography across computers'. :mad:
 
There's no reason whatsoever to think that penis washing workshops in africa have something to do with aids prevention whatsoever, especially aids prevention in america.

Quote from bigdavediode:

I've never said I'm okay with it, just that there's no reason whatsoever to think that HIV prevention programs would be unconstitutional.
 
Quote from phenomena:

The internet was created because of military spending during the cold war, not because of penis washing programs.

The High Performance Computing and Communication Act of 1991 ring a bell? It created NREN. DARPA created the ARPANET. NIST helped as well.

All government, all the time. You're soaking in it.
 
Quote from phenomena:

The internet was created because of military spending during the cold war, not because of penis washing programs.

Are you advocating more military spending?! Even though the internet came of it, I can't say I favor more military spending.

I am just pointing out how wasteful it turned out to be, only if government could fund studies where they knew results beforehand - there would not be so much waste.
 
Quote from phenomena:

There's no reason whatsoever to think that penis washing workshops in africa have something to do with aids prevention whatsoever, especially aids prevention in america.

I think it's a reasonable area of study given that HIV, semen and santorum fluid remains in genital folds. (I can't believe I got to use "santorum" in a sentence accurately! This is both great and hilarious!)
 
Quote from bigdavediode:

No, that's directly from the Treasury Department. They state that a flat tax would increase the deficit massively.
So a flat tax of ANY rate will increase the deficit?

Even if it's revenue neutral?

I think we've found someone who:

1)doesn't like any idea, however good, if it's proposed by a conservative
2)enjoys or makes his living from burdensome and ridiculously complicated tax codes
3)doesn't own a calculator
4)trusts the US treasury
5)doesn't understand elementary school level math


The debate is moot anyway, the only way the feds will change our absurd tax codes is as a result of an all out tax payer revolt/revolution.
 
I think your are right.

I think its time to go back to the way it was sent up by the founders.

Tariffs instead of income tax.
We do not have free trade, so I suggest we start supporting the redevelopment of our industrial base.
 
Back
Top