Global warming hoax fools millions

Quote from phenomena:

Aids research isn't in the scope of government. It is in the scope of Universities, hospitals, and medical research foundations.

More importantly, penis washing isn't aids research.
More...

Universities like UCLA which is the university actually doing the research?

And why couldn't penis washing be one of many factors that could reduce HIV retransmission?
 
Quote from phenomena:

Aids research isn't in the scope of government. It is in the scope of Universities, hospitals, and medical research foundations.

More importantly, penis washing isn't aids research.
More...

Research into a global pandemic that affects its citizens doesn't fall under government's purview?
 
Of course I'm making a fair point.

It should be compelling to any reader of the Constitution, who has a desire to adhere to it.

My point is that the US supreme court hasn't done a very good job of upholding the constitution in quite some time. I wouldn't expect to have them begin now. Several people have filed briefs similar to the ones you have proposed. The Supreme court refuses to hear the cases. Guess you didn't know that.

Quote from bigdavediode:

You're making a fair point, I expanded the point too far. Please allow me to rephrase: the briefs that you have not yet written for the Supreme Court would not be read, you state, because they (the Supreme Court) are not defending the constitution.

I hope that's clearer.

But ultimately, as I wrote, they're the arbiter of what is and isn't constitutional so for you to claim that wide swaths of government programs are unconstitutional solely because you say so is not compelling to any reader.
More...
 
Quote from phenomena:

Penis washing has nothing to do with HIV prevention. It was also only offered to African men, a racially based policy.
More...

Well, in fairness to UCLA, they did offer education to women for washing their penises as well, but the women pointed out that they didn't have them.
 
Quote from bigdavediode:

Well, in fairness to UCLA, they did offer education to women for washing their penises as well, but the women pointed out that they didn't have them.
More...

Obviously none of them have been to Thailand. :mad:
 
Quote from phenomena:

Of course I'm making a fair point.

It should be compelling to any reader of the Constitution, who has a desire to adhere to it.

My point is that the US supreme court hasn't done a very good job of upholding the constitution in quite some time. I wouldn't expect to have them begin now. Several people have filed briefs similar to the ones you have proposed. The Supreme court refuses to hear the cases. Guess you didn't know that.
More...

Alright, then perhaps using precedent you can explain how the Federal Government doesn't have the authority to spend the tax money it collects.
 
Why couldn't it be is the wrong question, why would it be is a better one. It's beside the point. It's money that I and my children, and probably grand children will have to pay back. Money for an "economic stimulus" which is going to teach africans how to wash their penises.

I get it, you guys support it. You guys are okay with millions being spent on "stimulus activities" such as penis washing instruction. You guys are okay with you and your offspring being stuck with the tab for this nonsense. That doesn't make it constitutional.

Quote from bigdavediode:

Universities like UCLA which is the university actually doing the research?

And why couldn't penis washing be one of many factors that could reduce HIV retransmission?
More...
 
Quote from phenomena:

Why couldn't it be is the wrong question, why would it be is a better one. It's beside the point. It's money that I and my children, and probably grand children will have to pay back. Money for an "economic stimulus" which is going to teach africans how to wash their penises.
More...

Just like the current generation is paying the price for all that research into 'sending pornography across computers'. :mad:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top